HIGH COURT: ......................................................................... 42
6.5. DISCUSSION ON ROLE AND FINDINGS: .............................................................. 43
7. UMAR KHALID – APPELLANT IN SLP (CRL.) 14165 OF 2025: ......................... 54
7.1. SUBMISSION ON BEHALF ... this Court are Sharjeel Imam [SLP (Crl.) No. 14030
of 2025], Umar Khalid [SLP (Crl.) No. 14165 of 2025], Shifa Ur Rehman
Umar Khalid vs Jawahalal Nehru University on 19 March, 2026
Author: Jasmeet Singh
Bench: Jasmeet Singh
$~60 & 61
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI ... DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 7406/2018
UMAR KHALID
.....Petitioner
Through:
versus
JAWAHALAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY
.....Respondent
Through: Mr. Manisha Singh, Adv.
61
+ W.P.(C) 7464
Umar Khalid vs State Of Nct Of Delhi & Ors on 13 January, 2026
$~38
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ... 2024
UMAR KHALID .....Petitioner
Through: Proxy counsel (presence not given)
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondent
Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP with
regular bail and dismissed
criminal appeals of two accused, namely, Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam
while analysing the individual role of each accused and differentiating
prosecution itself places Gulfisha Fatima as compared to the alleged
masterminds Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam, this Court is of the considered
view that further
Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)
:
Shamsul Islam Siddiqui, Umar Khalid
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)
:
G.A.
Court
Reportable Judgment placed on the file.
5. The appeal filed by Umar Khalid in SLP (Crl.) No. 14165 of
2025 is dismissed in terms
Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)
:
Shamsul Islam Siddiqui, Umar Khalid
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)
:
G.A.
Court
piece of land
with 'Farooq', 'Irshad' & 'Khalid' etc., and that the litigation with regard to
above-mentioned piece ... Farooq alias Badri', 'Irshad', 'Khalid', 'Hanif', 'Umar
Mohd.', 'Ashfaq', 'Parmeena', 'Zubaida
KASIF ALI @ AYAN CHOUDHARY & ORS. .....Petitioners
Through: Mohd. Khalid Ashraf and Mr.
Abuzar Umar, Advs. alongwith
petitioners in person.
versus
THE STATE
