petitioner is not seeking the relief on the basis of the
unregistered partition deed, but he wants to mark the above said documents for
collateral ... above said document is an unregistered one. Under the above said
circumstances, this court decides that the unregistered partition deed can be
marked only
recorded during the Panchayat is on a different footing from an unregistered partition deed and for that matter any other document which creates interest
inference has to be drawn from a wealth of circumstances. The deed and may be spelt out of the circumstances present. The right ... though Duraikannu Gramini got the suit property from a partition as per an unregistered deed. But neither Duraikannu was examined nor the said document
copy of the
partition deed dated 8th June, 1984, would demonstrate that on 11.09.1993, there
was an unregistered partition among the wife, her sister ... even after such
partition, the wife and her sister Mangalam jointly enjoyed their shares and by
virtue of the partition deed dated 8th June
plaintiff, he executed Ex.B1, an unregistered release deed and thereafter, pendente lite there emerged a partition deed among ... right in coming to the conclusion that Ex.B2 Partition deed cannot be relied upon as 1st Respondent's husband was not made
Krishnamurthy(the plaintiff) and Sundaravel, vide Ex.A20-the registered partition deed dated 24.2.1994, without taking any share for himself. However the suit property ... found referred to therein.
(vi)In Ex.A21-the unregistered panchayat Partition Muchilika dated 25.10.1994, which emerged between Krishnamoorthy(the plaintiff) and Sundaravel, there
which was filed for preliminary decree for partition and separate possession of 1/4th share of the plaintiff in the suit mentioned properties ... Ammal relinquished her share in the suit properties, as per the unregistered Release Deed-Ex.B13 dated 25.9.1975.
(d) Being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with
contract of tenancy, which cannot be proved by admission
of an unregistered lease deed into evidence.
18. The High Court in the impugned judgment relied ... observed as follows:
"The second contention was that the partition deed, even if it was not
registered could certainly be looked into
High Road, Chennai, her three sons, on the strength of the unregistered partnership deed-Ex.P5 have been running the jewellery business under the name ... sons are not at lagger heads and it is not a partition suit, which emerged among them. It is clear from the evidence that they
allegedly emerged on 17.03.1982 as an unregistered 'Will'; whereas Ex.B1-the registered cancellation deed dated 15.03.1982, cancelling the earlier registered ... Will' in Ex.A1-the partition deed, dated 05.12.1985, which emerged a year and a half after the death of Narayana Gounder
