identify upon production, approached
towards him from front side while using abusive language. Ct.
Bhagmal stopped his motorcycle and asked them to not to use ... boys were coming from the front side while using the
abusive language. They stopped their motorcycle and asked them
FIR No. 69/2010 State
accused Hardayal Rana criminally
intimidated the complainant Smt. Urmila and also used abusive language against
her with intent to insult her modesty. Further, accused Hardayal ... accused
Vijay Pal criminally intimidated the complainant Smt. Urmila and also used
abusive language against her with intent to insult her modesty.
2. After registration
Jasraj
and Lalit @ Laila S/o. Sh. Roop Chand started using abusive language
against him and his wife Smt. Pushpa on the pretext ... Lalit who
were present in the Court being his neighbourers started using abusive
language against him and his wife Smt. Pushpa on the pretext
Wajid,
Alishan and Afjal became very furious on us. They
started using abusive language against us. We
requested them to stop uttering abusive language ... ordinary general
nature of the abusive language that is the test for considering
whether the abusive language is an intentional insult likely to
provoke
what, in the ordinary
circumstances, would be the effect of the abusive
language used and not what the complainant actually
did as a result ... ordinary
general nature of the abusive language that is the test
for considering whether the abusive language
complainant's father and brother had
requested not to use abusive language. At that time, accused
No.1 got excited and he caught ... pushed him so, he fell down though accused continued to use
abusive language against his mother and sister. Then, accused
No.1 summoned accused
petitioner intentionally to tarnish the reputation of
the opposite party, had used abusive languages in front of the people.
4
4. The Learned Chief Judicial ... ordinary general
nature of the abusive language that is the test for considering
whether the abusive language is an intentional insult likely to
provoke
what, in
the ordinary circumstances, would be the effect of
the abusive language used and not what the
complainant actually did as a result ... ordinary general nature of the
abusive language that is the test for considering
whether the abusive language is an intentional insult
likely to provoke
what, in the
ordinary circumstances, would be the effect of the
abusive language used and not what the complainant
actually did as a result ... ordinary
general nature of the abusive language that is the test for
considering whether the abusive language is an
intentional insult likely to provoke
what, in the ordinary circumstances, would be
the effect of the abusive language used and not
what the complainant actually did as a result ... ordinary general nature of the
abusive language that is the test for considering
whether the abusive language is an intentional
insult likely to provoke
