Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 108 (0.54 seconds)

Unknown vs Union Of India on 1 April, 2011

Railway authorities in October 1984:- 1. Incorrect assessment of vacancies. 2. Increase in vacancies during the process of selection. 3. Administrative errors due to seniority ... also not a case where there had been any increase in the number of vacancies during the process of selection. The present is also
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Devinder Singh Son Of Shri Bhagwan Singh vs Union Of India Through on 24 February, 2014

posts against which selection was conducted and appointments were made. Increase of vacancies would result in expansion of consideration zone thereby giving opportunity of consideration ... well. For adjustment of other persons, the number of vacancies cannot be increased in the manner asked for by the applicants. The selection was conducted
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 8 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Roop Singh vs D/O Post on 11 November, 2025

Division​ ​whereby​ ​the​ ​vacancy​ ​reserved​ ​for​ ​EWS​ ​Category​ ​has​​been​​excluded​​and​​vide​​Annexure​​A-1​​the​​vacancies​​have​ ​been​ ​increased​ ​from ... Memo​ ​No.​ ​R&E/77-17/2020​ ​dated​ ​19.05.2021,​ ​increasing​ ​the​ ​total​ ​vacancies​ ​from​ ​two​ ​to​ ​four​ ​after​ ​including​ ​two​ ​unfilled​ ​posts​ ​from​ ​other
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Raj Kumar vs M/O Defence on 31 July, 2018

again a review of military farms with the intention of offsetting the increase in manpower and costs. The 6 O.A.060/00591/2017 decision ... kept in future against regular group-D vacancies. No Sanction is to be granted for increases of power or creating some new jobs
Central Administrative Tribunal - Chandigarh Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - P Gopinath - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next