recommendation of the Justice Shetty Commission to
increase the age of retirement from 60 to 65 years was not
accepted by the Supreme Court ... there is a backlog of vacancies
which has to be filled and as the Judge strength
has to be increased, as directed
show that the third respondent had
reserved liberty either to increase or reduce the vacancies and in
view of the same, if the third respondent
Annexures- B & C stated to be
the notifications increasing the number of posts advertised
at Annexure-A.
2. The grievance of the petitioner ... Annexures - B & C the number of posts have been
3
increased by 251, 228 and 775 in respect of teaching and
non-teaching staffs
Shri P M Parameshwaramurthy vs State Of Karnataka on 21 November, 2012
Author: N.Kumar
Sri G Ravi vs State Of Karnataka on 13 July, 2012
Bench: N.Kumar , H
Sri N Venkatesha Gowda vs The State Of Karnataka on 24 August, 2012
Author: D
Sri R Manjunath vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its Secy on 13 July
Honble Chief Justice vs Sri C Sudhakar on 12 October, 2012
Author: Anand Byrareddy
Bench
Dr J Sukumar vs State Of Karnataka on 27 July, 2012
Author: Aravind Kumar
Bench
L Chandramurthy vs Pearl Insulations Pvt Ltd on 11 July, 2012
Bench: D.V.Shylendra
