fraud alleged is this; Before the second marrigae, appellant (husband) had undergone vasectomy , but he did not disclose it to the respondent (wife ... know the reason. Appellant then divulged to her that he had undergone vasectomy before marrigae. But he pacified her that he would undergo recanalisation. However
husband - the male sterilization. In medical terminology it is called Vasectomy. The centrum question that arises for adjudication in the present writ petition ... Government, the husband of the petitioner, Sharda Prasad, decided to undergo the Vasectomy operation. The operation took place on 14-11-1996 at the Medical
bearing any child from him as he had already undergone vasectomy operation prior to their marriage. The petitioner considered herself to have been cheated ... pretended marriage by reason of his impotency on account of the said vasectomy operation, and on ground of cheating.
3. The petitioner examined herself
requested Mr. N.V. Antony to ascertain whether the respondent had undergone vasectomy as he had three children and all are fairly grown ... parents were assured that he has not undergone vasectomy. Even-after living with respondent with regular carnal copulation for nearly two years, petitioner
children were born to them out of this wedlook. The respondent underwent vasectomy operation on 8-1-1976. Thereafter the appellant and respondent lived together ... given evidence to the effect that in 1976, January, he underwent vasectomy operation. On 20-8-1978 he took his wife to her house
born, the petitioner-husband is said to have undergone a bilateral vasectomy operation on 27-7-1976. According to the petitioner he thereby lost ... wife. According to her the petitioner was behaving cruelly towards her, the vasectomy operation undergone by the petitioner was not effective, because of that
shall implement appropriate population control measures like separation of sexes, sterilization vasectomy, tubectomy and implanting of pallets, etc. (41) No zoo shall permit hybridization either
laparoscopy (ii) 1 day on the day on which the husband undergoes vasectomy (iii) 1 day on the day of IUD insertion / reinsertion ... case of male employees: (i) 6 days for vasectomy operation (ii) 7 days when the wife undergoes tubectomy / laparoscopy: Provided that special casual leave sanctioned
laproscopy (ii) 1 day on the day on which the husband undergoes vasectomy. (iii) 1 day on the day of IUD insertion / reinsertion. (b) Male ... Employees: (i) 6 days for vasectomy operation (ii) 7 days when the wife undergoes tubectomy / laproscopy. Provided that special casual leave sanctioned under this
insured person/insured woman has undergone operation on account of vasectomy/tubectomy, he/she be entitled to enhanced sickness benefit on any day on which
