Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
violate their right to life and personal liberty. In the landmark judgment, Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997), the supreme court addressed the issue
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 2149 (1.31 seconds)Constitution of India
Constitution of India
India
Constitution of India
CONTITUENTASSEMBLY 00 of 1950
Published in Gazette 00
Vishaka & Ors vs State Of Rajasthan & Ors on 13 August, 1997
Vishaka & Ors vs State Of Rajasthan & Ors on 13 August, 1997
Equivalent citations: AIR 1997 SUPREME COURT ... Bench: Chief Justice , Sujata V. Manohar , B. N. Kirpal
PETITIONER:
VISHAKA & ORS.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.
DATE OF JUDGMENT
Miraj Marketing Corporation vs Vishaka Engineering And Anr. on 23 November, 2004
Miraj Marketing Corporation vs Vishaka Engineering And Anr. on 23 November, 2004
Equivalent citations: 115(2004)DLT471, 2005(79)DRJ209
Author: Mukundakam Sharma
Bench: Mukundakam
Medha Kotwal Lele & Ors vs U.O.I. & Ors on 19 October, 2012
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5010 OF 2006
JUDGMENT
R.M. LODHA, J.
The Vishaka[1] judgment came on 13.8.1997. Yet,15 years after
the guidelines were ... psychological abuse that cuts across lines of income,
class and culture”.
4. Vishaka guidelines require the employers at workplaces as well
as other responsible persons
Sandeep Khurana vs Delhi Transco Ltd. And Ors. on 17 November, 2006
Complaints Committee as envisaged by the Supreme Court in its judgment in Vishaka's Case, 1997 (6) SCC 241 at 253, will be deemed ... recalled that the Supreme Court in the case of Vishaka and Ors. v. State of Rajasthan and Ors. issued certain directions to the employers
Aruna Chadha vs State Of Delhi on 25 July, 2013
referred to and
took assistance from the statement of Dr. Vishaka Munjal who had
allegedly been approached by the deceased in company of the present ... 2013 Page 12 of 27
postmortem report, Dr. Vishaka Munjal's statement under Section 161 of
the Code and the supplementary disclosure statement
U.S. Verma, Principal, D.P.S. ... vs National Commission For Women & Ors. on 12 October, 2009
school's lack of responsiveness, despite the binding directions in Vishaka, as a result
of which it was constrained to inquire into the matter ... absence of any order suspending or transferring
Verma, as was required by Vishaka, the Sharda Naik committee should not have
proceeded with its inquiry
Aureliano Fernandes vs State Of Goa . on 12 May, 2023
practicable” Rule 30-31
K. Journey from “Vishaka” Case to the Posh Act 31-38
(a) Vishaka Guidelines: Filling in the vacuum ... case (supra), which had clarified that the Complaints
Committee as contemplated in Vishaka and Others v. State of Rajasthan and
Others35 , will be the Inquiry
Dr. Ramji Sharan Dangi vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 1 April, 2022
judgment passed by the
Supreme Court in the case of Vishaka and others Vs. State of
Rajasthan and others reported ... learned counsel for the parties.
7. The report given by the Vishaka Committee reads as under:-
"------------------(not legible)
LkUnHkZ %& izkpk