stated that the claim of the Trust of conducting
Mandagapadi was false. It had been contended that the Trust was never in
possession and enjoyment ... deeds under which the
Trust had purchased the properties are void, since the Trust had not obtained prior
sanction under Section
Reform Act for holding the
land does not impose any condition that trust should not alienate the land. That
apart, even assuming there ... 11th respondent trust has become void abinitio, the 8th respondent ought
not to have accepted the property as security as M/s.Sterling Computers Limited
under Section 92 of CPC or Section
34 of Indian Trust Act. Therefore Void.
7. 04.05.2001 All India Islamic Foundation, Chennai(1st
respondent) claims ... acres and 9 cents to E.M.Gopalakrishna Kone Dharma
Trust and the said Trust sold the properties to the obstruction petitioner
under Section 92 of CPC or Section
34 of Indian Trust Act. Therefore Void.
7. 04.05.2001 All India Islamic Foundation, Chennai(1st
respondent) claims ... acres and 9 cents to E.M.Gopalakrishna Kone Dharma
Trust and the said Trust sold the properties to the obstruction petitioner
second defendant-Trusts
on the ground of breach of trust and fraud committed by them in
conducting the affairs of the Trust.
(c) Consequentially ... first defendant Trust inducting the 10th and
11th defendants as Trustees of the first defendant-Trust as illegal
and null and void.
(f) Consequentially
defendant is
unlawful, illegal, invalid, void and not binding on the Plaintiff Trust; (2A)
Directing the defendant No.1 to handover peaceful and vacant possession ... defendant is unlawful, illegal, invalid, void and not binding
on the Plaintiff Trust;
2A. Directing the defendant No.1 to handover peaceful and
vacant possession
Public Trusts in case no.1/59-60, holding the trust as private trust and not a public trust, was illegal and void. Such
relief ... Narsinghpur
holding that the property in question is a private trust is null and void and in consequence thereof, the order dated
Trust. Hence the order passed in Trust O.P.No.134 of 1921
altering the mode of line of succession itself is void. Since ... Indian Trust Act will not
apply.
(iii)Subsequent alleged settlement deed dated 17.04.1914 and the
constitution of fresh Trust Board are void as there
2010-11,
dated 09.03.2011 to the name of 6th defendant Trust as
null and void;
b) To declare the 5th and 6th defendant Trust ... contend that the petitioner Trust
was formed on 30.12.1983. In the Trust Deed, it has been stated that the trust is
operated on a vast
State Act which impinge upon the provisions of the Central Act are void and, therefore, unenforceable. It is for these reasons that the appointment ... High Power Committee by the State Government to inspect the Respondent Trust was void as has been rightly held by the High Court."
Reliance
