Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

case (supra), this Court recognized the right to compensation for wrongful termination, even if the right to reinstatement with back wages was not made

longer needed. If the petitioner has grievance against his wrongful termination, he may have to take his remedy in accordance with law where he would ... opportunity to prove the aspect of his wrongful termination. The petitioner may seek an alternative remedy. No case of invoking writ jurisdiction is made

employee. If an employee acts in any wrong manner, then only the order of termination is passed. That being the position, it would

passed the impugned order Annexure P-5, withdrawing the order of termination dated 20.12.1996. The petitioner, however, has been denied salary and allowances ... stated that these averments are wrong and hence denied. The Civil Writ Petition No. 4269 of 2010 3 termination of the petitioner is justified

arrears would be allowed for the entire period from the date of termination was not approved and it was held that ... declaration that an order of dismissal or termination from service passed against the dismissal employee is wrongful, illegal and ultra vires is governed by Article

declaration that an order of dismissal or termination from service passed against the dismissed employee being wrongful, illegal or ultra vires is governed by Article ... declaration of the order of dismissal or termination from service passed against the plaintiff is wrong, illegal and ultra vires and is governed by Article

that suit for declaration that an order or termination from service passed against the plaintiff is wrongful illegal and ultra-vires is governed by Article ... declaration that an order of dismissal or termination from service passed against the plaintiff is wrongful, illegal or ultra vires is governed

setting aside the order of his termination on the ground that the same was illegal, ultra vires, wrong besides some other grounds. It was also

took this to be an order of termination of services and filed a representation before defendant No. 2, Director of Public Instruction (College) who while ... years, she stood automatically confirmed and thus the order of termination, which was wrongly passed was rightly set aside by the DPI and upheld

finding by the Labour Court is that there was nothing wrong with the termination order passed in respect of the petitioner- workman. His removal