reinstated on the ground of acquittal. The termination of services
is on the factum of giving wrong information having bearing ... since he has been acquitted on 23.03.2018 before the
impugned order of termination, hence deserves to be reinstated in service.
SUBMISSIONS OF THE APPLICANT
accept the offer of appointment as Accountant when the order of
termination from the Divisional Accountant was served on him.
4. After having gone through ... along with him) for
termination only on ground that they had not passed the examination
within four years is wrong. The respondents have not produced
accept the offer of appointment as Accountant when the order of
termination from the Divisional Accountant was served on him.
4. After having gone through ... along with him) for
termination only on ground that they had not passed the examination
within four years is wrong. The respondents have not produced
after the decision of this Tribunal) is wrong. The
applicant has argued that such termination is erroneous because it has not
been explained
wrong
information or concealment of any fact at the time of appointment or
even any time during the service period shall lead to termination ... SINHA
4 OA N0. 58 of 2017
issuance of impugned order of termination. Applicant has already sent
the copy of acquittal order through his representation
treated differently.
3.5 Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the abrupt
termination after the applicant had completed training, received a
provisional appointment letter, joined ... Criteria, which clearly
stipulates that applications containing incomplete or incorrect data or
wrong documents are liable to outright rejection.
4.2 Learned Counsel for the respondents
applicant
was given by the Tribunal, and they issue an order of termination of
service dated 17.05.2016 (Annexure A/11) under Rule ... letter dated 11.06.2014 (wrongly mentioned as
04.06.2014 in the appointment order) of PMG (N), but no selection
file was brought and termination order was stayed
posting on 01.08.2016, which smells
malafide and wrong attitude/intention of the respondent for
the wrongful gain.
[iii] The applicant draws our attention ... Post Offices, Rohtas Division, Sasaram on 05.08.2016
[Annexure-A/12] against her termination order but nothing
has been done by them. The applicant submitted that
stay order against his termination order.
Therefore, it is clear that the respondents have themselves
proved that they have committed wrong in appointment.
Therefore
interim orders granted by this Tribunal against orders of
termination when the termination was prima facie seen to be pursuant to
some direction from ... notice where
termination of services of EDA by an authority superior to appointing
authority was found to be wrong. The learned counsel for the applicant
