notional date of promotion ought to have been given from the
date on which his juniors were given promotion. The petitioner now wishes to
withdraw ... reserved with the
petitioner to challenge the notional date of promotion wrongly given to the
petitioner for the post of Chief Engineer.
2. Permission
means qualifying service. Shri K.B. Rajoria was wrongly superseded on 22.2.1995. The notional promotion was given to him retrospectively and from that date ... could be given promotion and to set aside her promotion, and if she was wrongly given promotion, instead of perpetuating illegality.
27. The Office Memorandum
applications were called for from the eligible Junior Stenographers for
promotion to the post of Senior Stenographers through speed test. On 22.9.1991 the
test ... having not been
conducted, the opposite party No.5 had been wrongly given promotion. The order of
reversion was passed on 21.11.1992. Thereafter
filled in only by way of direct recruitment and
therefore, any appointment / promotion de-hors the Government
Resolution dtd.14/8/1967 is absolutely illegal ... tried to
rectify the mistake by reverting those persons who were wrongly
given promotion. Merely because after decision of the learned Single
Judge reserving liberty
that so far as the
petitioner is concerned he has been wrongly given promotion the
senior selection grade and, as such, while finalizing accounts
vide
order dated 20th October, 2008 and for no justifiable reason, the promotion
of the petitioner has been withdrawn and demoted vide order dated 29th ... respondents are
saying that the petitioner was wrongly given promotion and it was wrongly
given by the Jharkhand Public Service Commission and therefore, the stand
West Central Railway, whether the promotion issued to him is correct or not and when
would the wrong promotion given to him be rectified
happened so that when Accountant General found
that time bound promotion had wrongly been given it made
recommendation for refixation and recovery of the amount ... Jharkhand (supra) when it was detected that time bound
promotion was wrongly given, the amount drawn in excess was
ordered to be recovered from
benefit given to the said officer was wrong as the
same was applicable in case an officer is given an officiating promotion
under Rule ... before the Tribunal, it was not contended that they were wrongly
given the promotion. The Tribunal also relied on the fact that the
counsel
promotion given effect by the respondents is erroneous and it is against the Rules and Government Orders and even if an erroneous promotion is given ... Suryanaranayan, it was held that if erroneous promotion is given by wrongly interpreting the rules, the employer cannot be prevented from applying the rules rightly
