Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 24, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Shivprasad Mulshankar Jani vs Sureshbhai Mayaram Sadhu & 2 on 12 June, 2014

Author: Anant S. Dave

Bench: Anant S. Dave, Sonia Gokani

        R/SCR.A/1443/2014                             ORDER




         IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (HABEAS CORPUS) NO. 1443 of 2014

================================================================
           SHIVPRASAD MULSHANKAR JANI....Applicant(s)
                          Versus
         SURESHBHAI MAYARAM SADHU & 2....Respondent(s)
================================================================
Appearance:
MR DR BHATT, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR AMIT N CHAUDHARY, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 1 - 2
MR JK SHAH APP for the Respondent(s) No. 3
================================================================

        CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANANT S. DAVE
               and
               HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI

                            Date : 12/06/2014


                             ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANANT S. DAVE) The petitioner has filed this petition under  Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking writ  of habeas corpus to direct the respondent Nos.1 and 2  to   produce   minor   corpus,   grand­daughter   of   the  petitioner before the Court and after ascertaining the  wishes of minor corpus, she be sent at liberty.  

2 The   petitioner   is   grandfather   of   corpus,  aged   around   15   years,   who   stays   with   her   mother   -  Arti, who remarried with Shri Sureshbhai Mayaram Sadhu 

-  respondent No.1 upon untimely death of son of the  Page 1 of 16 R/SCR.A/1443/2014 ORDER petitioner - Ronak.

3 The   case   of   the   petitioner   is   that   he   had  received information from residents of the locality at  Sanand that his grand­daughter is physically exploited  by her step­father and for which even representation  dated   15.02.2014   was   submitted   to   the   Police   Sub­ Inspector,   Sanand   and   neighbours   of   the   minor   girl  also   submitted   representation   to   the   Mamlatdar,  Ahmedabad also. The petitioner further apprehends that  his grand­daughter ­  minor may be dragged into human  trafficking and she is under control and influence of  step­father and it may not be possible for her to come  out openly and express her desire against respondent  No.1.     It   is,   therefore,   submitted   that   she   may   be  produced   before   this   Court   and   her   will   may   be  ascertained.     Thus,   the  anxiety   of   the  petitioner   -  grandfather   is   to   see   that   his   grand­daughter   is  rescued immediately or in alternative she may be sent  to child protection home for the time being so that  she may come out of the influence of her mother and  step­father.

4 Learned   advocate   appearing   for   petitioner  would   contend   that   minor   is   illegally   confined   by  respondent Nos.1 and 2 and her life is in danger and  in view of voice of grievance ventilated by residents  of   the   locality,   who   had   seen   the   plight   of   minor  being exploited by her step­father, this court would  protect her by passing appropriate order.

Page 2 of 16
         R/SCR.A/1443/2014                            ORDER




5           We   have   perused   record   of   the   case   which 

contains CR No.I­20/2014 dated 08.02.2014 filed before  Sanand   Police   Station,   District   Ahmedabad   by   minor  corpus for the offences punishable under Sections 363366376114 and 506(2) of the Indian Penal Code read  with provisions of Protection of Children from Sexual  Offences Act, 2012 against six accused, who exploited  the   minor   girl   physically   by   committing   the   above  offences and one of the accused include brother of the  petitioner.  It is reported that now investigation is  carried out and charge sheet dated 03.05.2014 is also  filed.  

6 Today,   corpus   is   present   in   the   court.  Considering the nature of proceedings, the matter is  taken up in the chamber.  The corpus has categorically  and   unequivocally   adhered   to   the   contents   and  allegations   made   by   her   in   complaint   being     No.I­ 20/2014.     She   further   states   that   no   kind   of  harassment is meted out to her either by her mother or  step­father  and   on   the   contrary   she  is  treated   with  utmost care and allegations levelled in this petition  by her grandfather against her mother and step­father  viz. respondent Nos.1 and 2 are not only baseless, but  frivolous.  The corpus has further stated that on the  contrary   her   stepfather   and   mother   are   compelled   to  leave Sanand and shifted to their native near Dehgam  and   even   during   pendency   of   this   petition,   they  continued to receive threats from accused persons of  the complaint being  No.I­20/2014.   She expressed her  Page 3 of 16 R/SCR.A/1443/2014 ORDER wish   and   will   to   go   and   stay   with   her   mother   and  stepfather.  

7 Considering   the   facts   and   circumstances   of  the   case   and   desire   expressed   by   the   corpus,   the  corpus   is   permitted   to   go   and   stay   along   with   her  mother   and   stepfather   viz.   respondent   Nos.   2   and   1  respectively.    

8 In   The   case   of   Delhi   Domestic   Working  Women's Forum vs. Union of India & Ors. reported in  (1995)1   SCC   14,   the   Apex   Court   indicated   the   broad  parameters in assisting the victims of rape in para 15  of the said judgment.  Para 15 reads as under:  

"15.In this background, we think it necessary to   indicate   the   broad   parameters   in   assisting   the   victims of rape.
[1] The   complainants   of   sexual   assault   cases   should be provided with legal representation. It   is   important   to   have   someone   who   is   well­   20   acquainted with the criminal justice system. The   role of the victim's advocate would not only be   to   explain   to   the   victim   the   nature   of   the   proceedings, to prepare her for the case and to   assist her in the police station and in court but  to provide her with guidance as to how she might   obtain   help   of   a   different   nature   from   other   agencies, for example, mind counseling or medical  assistance. It is important to secure continuity   of   assistance   by   ensuring   that   the   same   person   who  looked   after  the  complainant's  interests  in  the police station represent her till the end of   the case.
[2] Legal assistance will have to be provided at   Page 4 of 16 R/SCR.A/1443/2014 ORDER the   police   station   since   the   victim   of   sexual   assault might very well be in a distressed state   upon arrival at the police station, the guidance   and support of a lawyer at this stage and whilst   she   was   being   questioned   would   be   of   great   assistance to her.
[3] The police should be under a duty to inform  the victim of her right to representation before   any   questions   were   asked   of   her   and   that   the   police report should state that the victim was so  informed.
[4] A list of advocates willing to act in these  cases   should   be   kept   at   the   police   station   for   victims who did not have a particular lawyer in   mind or whose own lawyer was unavailable.
[5] The   advocate   shall   be   appointed   by   the  court,   upon   application   by   the   police   at   the   earliest   convenient   moment,   but   in   order   to   ensure that victims were questioned without undue  delay,   advocates   would   be   authorised   to   act   at   the police station before leave of the court was   sought or obtained.
[6] In all rape trials anonymity of  the victim   must be maintained, as far as necessary.
[7] It   is   necessary,   having   regard   to   the   Directive   Principles   contained   under   Article  38(1)   of   the   Constitution   of   India   to   set   up   Criminal   Injuries   Compensation   Board.   Rape  victims   frequently   incur   substantial   financial  loss. Some, for example, are too traumatised to   continue in employment.
[8] Compensation for victims shall be awarded by   the   court   on   conviction   of   the   offender   and   by   the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board whether   or   not   a   conviction   has   taken   place.   The   Board   will take into account pain, suffering and shock   Page 5 of 16 R/SCR.A/1443/2014 ORDER as well as loss of earnings due to pregnancy and   the expenses of child birth if this occurred as a  result of the rape."

9 In the case of Indian Woman Says Gang­Raped  on Orders of Village Court published in Business and  Financial   News   dated   23.01.2014,   in   Suo   Motu   Writ  Petition [Cri.] No. 24 of 2014, the Apex Court held in  paragraphs 10 to 24 and 27 as under: 

"10 Violence   against   women   is   a   recurring  crime across the globe and India is no exception in  this   regard.   The   case   at   hand   is   the   epitome   of  aggression  against a woman and it is shocking that  even with rapid modernization such crime persists in  our society. Keeping in view this dreadful increase  in   crime   against   women,   the   Code   of   Criminal  Procedure   has   been   specifically   amended   by   recent  amendment   dated   03.02.2013   in   order   to   advance   the  safeguards for women in such circumstances which are  as under:­

154. Information in cognizable cases." (1) x x x Provided   that   if   the   information   is   given   by   the  woman   against   whom   an   offence   under   Section   326A,  Section   326B,   Section   354,   Section   354A,   Section  354B,   Section   354C,   Section   354D,   Section   376,  Section   376A,   Section   376B,   Section   376C,   Section  376D,   Section   376E,   or   Section   509   of   the   Indian  Penal   Code   is   alleged   to   have   been   committed   or  attempted, then such information shall be recorded,  by a woman police officer or any woman officer:

Provided further that:­
(a)   in   the   event   that   the   person   against   whom   an  offence   under   Section   354,   Section   354A,   Section  354B,   Section   354C,   Section   354D,   Section   376,  Section   376A,   Section   376B,   Section   376C,   Section  376D,   Section   376E,   or   Section   509   of   the   Indian  Penal   Code   is   alleged   to   have   been   committed   or  attempted, is temporarily or permanently mentally or  physically disabled, then such information shall be  Page 6 of 16 R/SCR.A/1443/2014 ORDER recorded   by   a   police   officer,   at   the   residence   of  the   person   seeking   to   report   such   offence   or   at   a  convenient   place   of   such   person's   choice,   in   the  presence of an interpreter or a special educator, as  the case may be;
(2) x x x (3) x x x
161. "Examination of witnesses by police:­ (1) x x x (2) x x x (3) x x x Provided   further   that   the   statement   of   a   woman  against   whom   an   offence   under   Section   354,   Section  354A,   Section   354B,   Section   354C,   Section   354D,  Section   376,   Section   376A,   Section   376B,   Section  376C, Section 376D, Section 376E, or Section 509 of  the   Indian   Penal   Code   is   alleged   to   have   been  committed or attempted shall be recorded, by a woman  police officer or any woman officer.

164. "Recording of confessions and statements." 5A   In   cases   punishable   under   Section   354,   Section  354A, Section 354B, Section 354C, Section 354D, sub­ Section   (1)   or   sub­Section   (2)   of   Section   376,  Section   376A,   Section   376B,   Section   376C,   Section  376D,   Section   376E,   or   Section   509   of   the   Indian  Penal Code, the Judicial Magistrate shall record the  statement   of   the   person   against   whom   such   offence  has been committed in the manner prescribed in sub­ Section   (5),   as   soon   as   the   commission   of   the  offence is brought to the notice of the police:

164 A. Medical  examination of the victim of rape.­  (1)   Where,   during   the   stage   when   an   offence   of  committing  rape or attempt to commit  rape is under  investigation,  it is proposed to get the person  of  the woman with whom rape is alleged or attempted to  have   been   committed   or   attempted,   examined   by   a  medical expert, such examination shall be conducted  by   a  registered   medical   practitioner   employed   in   a  hospital run by the Government or a local authority  and   in   the   absence   of   such   a   practitioner,   by   any  other   registered   medical   practitioner,   with   the  Page 7 of 16 R/SCR.A/1443/2014 ORDER consent   of   such   woman   or   of   a   person   competent   to  give such consent on her behalf and such woman shall  be   sent   to   such   registered   medical   practitioner  within twenty­four hours from the time of receiving  the   information   relating   to   the   commission   of   such  offence.
(2)   The   registered   medical   practitioner,   to   whom  such woman is sent shall, without delay, examine her  person   and   prepare   a   report   of   his   examination  giving   the   following   particulars,   namely:­   (i)   the  name and address of the woman and of the person by  whom she was brought;
(ii) the age of the woman;
(iii)   the   description   of   material   taken   from   the  person of the woman for DNA profiling;
(iv) marks of injury, if any, on the person of the  woman;   (v)   general   mental   condition   of   the   woman; 

and   (vi)   other   material   particulars   in   reasonable  detail, (3) The report shall state precisely the reasons for  each conclusion arrived at.

(4)   The   report   shall   specifically   record   that   the  consent of the woman or of the person competent, to  give such consent on her behalf to such examination  had been obtained.

(5) The exact time of commencement and completion of  the examination shall also be noted in the report. (6)   The   registered   medical   practitioner   shall,  without   delay   forward   the   report   to   the  investigating   officer   who   shall   forward   it   to   the  Magistrate referred to in section 173 as part of the  documents   referred   to   in   clause   (a)   of   sub­section  (5)   of   that   section.   (7)   Nothing   in   this   section  shall   be   construed   as   rendering   lawful   any  examination without  the consent  of the woman or of  any   person   competent   to   give   such   consent   on   her  behalf.

Explanation­   For   the   purposes   of   this   section,  "examination"   and   "registered   medical   practitioner" 

shall have the same meanings as in section 53.
11 The   courts   and   the   police   officials   are  required to be vigilant in upholding these rights of  the victims of crime as the effective implementation  of   these   provisions   lies   in   their   hands.   In   fact,  Page 8 of 16 R/SCR.A/1443/2014 ORDER the recurrence of such crimes has been taken note of  by   this   Court   in   few   instances   and   seriously  condemned in the ensuing manner.
12 In Lata Singh vs. State of U.P. and Ors.,  (2006)   5   SCC   475,   this   Court,   in   paras   17   and   18,  held as under:
"17. The caste system is a curse on the nation   and the sooner it is destroyed the better. In   fact, it is dividing the nation at a time when   we   have   to   be   united   to   face   the   challenges   before the nation unitedly. Hence, inter­caste   marriages are in fact in the national interest   as   they   will   result   in   destroying   the   caste   system.   However,   disturbing   news   are   coming   from   several   parts   of   the   country   that   young   men and women who undergo inter­caste marriage,   are   threatened   with   violence,   or   violence   is   actually   committed   on   them.   In   our   opinion,   such acts of violence or threats or harassment   are   wholly   illegal   and   those   who   commit   them   must be severely punished. This is a free and   democratic country, and once a person becomes a   major   he   or   she   can   marry   whosoever   he/she   likes. If the parents of the boy or girl do not   approve of such inter­caste or inter­religious   marriage the maximum they can do is that they   can   cut­off   social   relations   with   the   son   or   the  daughter,  but  they  cannot  give  threats  or   commit or instigate acts of violence and cannot   harass   the   person   who   undergoes   such   inter­ caste   or   inter­religious   marriage.   We,   therefore,   direct   that   the   administration/police   authorities   throughout   the country will see to it that if any boy or   girl   who   is   a   major   undergoes   inter­caste   or   inter­religious   marriage   with   a   woman   or   man   who is a major, the couple is not harassed by   anyone   nor   subjected   to   threats   or   acts   of   violence, and anyone who gives such threats or   harasses   or   commits   acts   of   violence   either   himself or at his instigation, is taken to task   by   instituting   criminal   proceedings   by   the   police   against   such   persons   and   further   stern   action   is   taken   against   such   persons   as   provided by law.
18.   We   sometimes   hear   of   honour   killings   of   such persons who undergo inter­caste or inter­ Page 9 of 16 R/SCR.A/1443/2014 ORDER religious   marriage   of   their   own   free   will.   There   is   nothing   honourable   in   such   killings,   and in fact they are nothing but barbaric and   shameful   acts   of   murder   committed   by   brutal,   feudal­   minded   persons   who   deserve   harsh   punishment. Only in this way can we stamp out   such acts of barbarism".

13 In Arumugam Servai vs. State of Tamilnadu,  (2011)   6   SCC   405,   this   Court,   in   paras   12   and   13,  observed as under:­ "12.   We   have   in   recent   years   heard   of   Khap   Panchayats (known as Katta Panchayats in Tamil   Nadu)   which   often   decree   or   encourage   honour   killings   or   other   atrocities   in   an   institutionalised   way   on   boys   and   girls   of   different castes and religion, who wish to get   married or have been married, or interfere with   the   personal   lives   of   people.   We   are   of   the   opinion that this is wholly illegal and has to   be ruthlessly stamped out. As already stated in   Lata Singh case, there is nothing honourable in   honour   killing   or   other   atrocities   and,   in   fact,  it  is nothing  but  barbaric   and  shameful   murder. Other atrocities in respect of personal   lives   of   people   committed   by   brutal,   feudal­   minded   persons   deserve   harsh   punishment.   Only   in   this   way   can   we   stamp   out   such   acts   of   barbarism and feudal mentality. Moreover, these   acts   take   the   law   into   their   own   hands,   and   amount   to   kangaroo   courts,   which   are   wholly   illegal.

13.   Hence,   we   direct   the   administrative   and   police   officials   to   take   strong   measures   to   prevent   such   atrocious   acts.   If   any   such   incidents   happen,   apart   from   instituting   criminal   proceedings   against   those   responsible   for   such   atrocities,   the   State   Government   is   directed   to   immediately   suspend   the   District   Magistrate/Collector   and   SSP/SPs   of   the   district   as   well   as   other   officials   concerned   and charge­sheet them and proceed against them   departmentally  if  they  do  not  (1)  prevent  the   incident   if   it   has   not   already   occurred   but   they have knowledge of it in advance, or (2) if   it has occurred, they do not promptly apprehend   the culprits and others involved and institute   criminal   proceedings   against   them,   as   in   our   opinion they will be deemed to be directly or   Page 10 of 16 R/SCR.A/1443/2014 ORDER indirectly accountable in this connection". 14 Likewise, the Law Commission of India, in  its 242nd Report on Prevention of Interference with  the Freedom of Matrimonial Alliances (in the name of  Honour and Tradition) had suggested that: 

"11.1   In   order   to   keep   a   check   on   the   high­ handed   and   unwarranted   interference   by   the   caste   assemblies   or   panchayats   with   sagotra,   inter­   caste   or   inter­religious   marriages,   which   are   otherwise   lawful,   this   legislation   has   been   proposed   so   as   to   prevent   the   acts   endangering   the   liberty   of   the   couple   married   or intending to marry and their family members.   It is considered necessary that there should be   a   threshold   bar   against   the   congregation   or   assembly   for   the   purpose   of   disapproving   such   marriage / intended marriage and the conduct of   the   young   couple.   The   members   gathering   for   such purpose, i.e., for condemning the marriage   with   a   view   to   take   necessary   consequential   action,   are   to   be   treated   as   members   of   unlawful assembly for which a mandatory minimum   punishment has been prescribed.
11.2   So   also   the   acts   of   endangerment   of   liberty   including   social   boycott,   harassment,   etc. of the couple or their family members are   treated   as   offences   punishable   with   mandatory   minimum   sentence.   The   acts   of   criminal   intimidation by members of unlawful assembly or   others   acting   at   their   instance   or   otherwise   are also made punishable with mandatory minimum   sentence.
11.3 A presumption that a person participating   in   an   unlawful   assembly   shall   be   presumed   to   have   also   intended   to   commit   or   abet   the   commission of offences under the proposed Bill   is provided for in Section 6.
11.4 Power to prohibit the unlawful assemblies   and   to   take   preventive   measures   are   conferred   on   the   Sub­Divisional   /   District   Magistrate.   Further,   a   SDM/DM   is   enjoined   to   receive   a   request or information from any person seeking   protection   from   the   assembly   of   persons   or   members of any family who are likely to or who   have been objecting to the lawful marriage. 11.5   The  provisions  of  this  proposed   Bill  are   Page 11 of 16 R/SCR.A/1443/2014 ORDER without   prejudice   to   the   provisions   of   Indian   Penal   Code.   Care   has   been   taken,   as   far   as   possible,  to  see  that  there  is  no  overlapping   with   the  provisions  of  the  general  penal   law.   In   other   words,   the   criminal   acts   other   than   those   specifically   falling   under   the   proposed   Bill   are   punishable   under   the   general   penal   law.
11.6   The   offence   will   be   tried   by   a   Court   of   Session   in   the   district   and   the   offences   are   cognizable, non­bailable and non­compoundable. 11.7   Accordingly,   the   Prohibition   of   Interference   with   the   Freedom   of   Matrimonial   Alliances Bill 20 has been prepared in order to   effectively check the existing social malady."

15 It   is   further   pertinent   to   mention   that  the issue relating to the role of Khap Panchayats is  pending before this Court in Shakti Vahini vs. Union  of India and Others in W.P. (C) No. 231 of 2010.

16 Ultimately,   the   question   which   ought   to  consider   and   assess   by   this   Court   is   whether   the  State Police Machinery could have possibly prevented  the   said   occurrence.   The   response   is   certainly   a  yes.   The   State   is   duty   bound   to   protect   the  Fundamental Rights of its citizens; and an inherent  aspect   of   Article   21   of   the   Constitution   would   be  the freedom of choice in marriage. Such offences are  resultant   of   the   States   incapacity   or   inability   to  protect the Fundamental Rights of its citizens.

17 In a report by the Commission of Inquiry,  headed   by   a   former   Judge   of   the   Delhi   High   Court  Justice Usha Mehra (Retd.), (at pg. 86), it was seen  (although   in   the   context   of   the   NCR)   that   police  officers   seldom   visit   villages;   it   was   suggested  that a Police Officer must visit a village on every  alternate  days to "instill a sense of security and  confidence   amongst   the   citizens   of   the   society   and  to check the depredations of criminal elements".

18 As   a   long­term   measure   to   curb   such  crimes,   a   larger   societal   change   is   required   via  education   and   awareness.   Government   will   have   to  Page 12 of 16 R/SCR.A/1443/2014 ORDER formulate and implement policies in order to uplift  the socio­economic condition of women, sensitization  of   the   Police   and   other   concerned   parties   towards  the   need   for   gender   equality   and   it   must   be   done  with   focus   in   areas   where   statistically   there   is  higher percentage of crimes against women. Victim Compensation:

19 No compensation can be adequate nor can it  be   of   any   respite   for   the   victim   but   as  the  State  has failed in protecting such serious violation of a  victim's fundamental right, the State is duty bound  to   provide   compensation,   which   may   help   in   the  victim's   rehabilitation.   The   humiliation   or   the  reputation that is snuffed out cannot be recompensed  but then monetary compensation will at least provide  some solace.

20 In 2009, a new Section 357A was introduced  in   the   Code   which   casts   a   responsibility   on   the  State   Governments   to   formulate   Schemes   for  compensation to the victims of crime in coordination  with   the   Central   Government   whereas,   previously,  Section 357 ruled the field which was not mandatory  in nature and only the offender can be directed to  pay   compensation   to   the   victim   under   this   Section.  Under the new Section 357A, the onus is put on the  District   Legal   Service   Authority   or   State   Legal  Service   Authority   to   determine   the   quantum   of  compensation in each case. However, no rigid formula  can   be   evolved   as   to   have   a   uniform   amount,   it  should vary in facts and circumstances of each case.  In the case of State of Rajasthan vs. Sanyam, Lodha,  (2011) 13 SCC 262, this Court held that the failure  to   grant   uniform   ex­gratia   relief   is   not   arbitrary  or   unconstitutional.   It   was   held   that   the   quantum  may depend on facts of each case.

21 Learned amicus also advocated for awarding  interim   compensation   to   the   victim   by   relying   upon  judicial   precedents.   The   concept   of   the   payment   of  interim   compensation   has   been   recognized   by   this  Court   in  Bodhisattwa   Gautam   vs.   Miss   Subhra  Chakraborty,  (1996) 1 SCC 490. It referred to Delhi  Domestic   Working   Women's   Forum   vs.   Union   of   India  and   others   to   reiterate   the   centrality   of  compensation as a remedial measure  in case of rape  Page 13 of 16 R/SCR.A/1443/2014 ORDER victims. It was observed as under:­ "If   the   Court   trying   an   offence   of   rape   has   jurisdiction   to   award   the   compensation   at   the   final stage, there is no reason to deny to the   Court   the   right   to   award   interim   compensation   which should also be provided in the Scheme."

22 This   Court,   in   P.   Rathinam   vs.   State   of  Gujarat,   (1994)   SCC   (Crl)   1163,   which   pertained   to  rape of a tribal woman in police custody awarded an  interim compensation  of Rs. 50,000/­ to be paid by  the   State   Government.   Likewise,   this   Court,   in  Railway Board vs. Chandrima  Das,  (2000)  2 SCC 465,  upheld the High Court's direction to pay Rs. 10 lacs  as compensation to the victim, who was a Bangladeshi  National.   Further,   this   Court   in   SLP   (Crl.)   No.  5019/2012   titled   as   Satya   Pal   Anand   vs.   State   of  M.P.,   vide   order   dated   05.08.2013,   enhanced   the  interim relief granted by the State Government from  Rs. 2 lacs to 10 lacs each to two girl victims.

23 The   Supreme   Court   of   Bangladesh   in   The  State   vs.   Md.   Moinul   Haque   and   Ors.   (2001)   21   BLD  465 has interestingly observed that victims of rape  should   be   compensated   by   giving   them   half   of   the  property   of   the   rapist(s)   as   compensation   in   order  to rehabilitate them in the society. If not adopting  this liberal reasoning, we should at least be in a  position to provide substantial compensation to the  victims.

24 Nevertheless,  the obligation of the State  does   not   extinguish   on   payment   of   compensation,  rehabilitation   of   victim   is   also   of   paramount  importance.   The   mental   trauma   that   the   victim  suffers due to the commission of such heinous crime,  rehabilitation   becomes   a   must   in   each   and   every  case. 

27 Further,   we   also   wish   to   clarify   that  according to Section 357B, the compensation payable  by the State Government under Section 357A shall be  in   addition   to   the   payment   of   fine   to   the   victim  under   Section   326A   or   Section   376D   of   the   IPC. 

Page 14 of 16

R/SCR.A/1443/2014 ORDER Also, no details have been given as to the measures  taken for security and safety of the victim and her  family.   Merely   providing   interim   measure   for   their  stay   may   protect   them   for   the   time   being   but   long  term   rehabilitation   is   needed   as   they   are   all  material   witnesses   and   likely   to   be   socially  ostracized.   Consequently,   we   direct   the   Circle  Officer of the area to inspect the victim's place on  day­to­day basis.

10 In view of the above, the respondent - State  to adhere to the above broad parameters and directions  issued by the Apex Court in the cases of   [i] Delhi  Domestic   Working   Women's   Forum   (supra)   and   [ii]  Indian   Woman   Says   Gang­Raped   on   Orders   of   Village  Court published in Business and Financial News dated  23.01.2014, in Suo Motu Writ Petition [Cri.] No. 24 of  2014   (supra)   at   the   stage   of   registration   of   FIR,  during   the   course   of   investigation   and   after  submitting charge sheet before the competent court of  law  and  at  the end  of  the  trial, if the  accused is  convicted, the concerned court shall address itself to  provisions   of   Section   357   of   the   Code   of   Criminal  Procedure,   1973   for   awarding   compensation   to   the  victim.  

11 Considering   the   facts   and   circumstances   of  the   case   and   as   per   the   law   laid   down   by   the   Apex  Court   in   the   above   decisions,   the   corpus   being  complainant and victim of heinous crime, as reflected  prima facie upon reading of the complaint and used to  receive   threats   from   time   to   time   from   the   accused  persons for which she had to discontinue her studies  of 10th  Standard and to seek admission at a different  Page 15 of 16 R/SCR.A/1443/2014 ORDER school in Dehgam, we will be failing in our duty if we  do  not   direct   the  police   authorities   to   protect  her  and   parents  i.e.   respondent   Nos.1   and   2  herein   till  the case is committed to the court.  By allowing this  petition and permitting the corpus to go and live with  her   mother   and   stepfather,   we   direct   the   respondent  state   authorities   viz.   District   Superintendent   of  Police, Ahmedabad [Rural] to oversee that in case of  any threat administers either to minor - complainant  of   the   above   FIR   or   her   mother   or   stepfather   with  regard   to   subject   matter   of   the   petition   and   above  FIR,   immediate   suitable   action   be   taken,   including  providing protection to minor.

12 In  the   above   terms,   the  petition  of  habeas  corpus stands disposed of. 

   

Rule is discharged.

(ANANT S.DAVE, J.) (MS SONIA GOKANI, J.) pvv Page 16 of 16