Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0] [Entire Act]

State of Haryana - Section

Section 15 in The Punjab Borstal Rules

15. Interview and communications with inmates.

(1)Every newly admitted inmate will be allowed reasonable facilities for seeing or communicating with his relatives or intimate friends with a view to the preparation of an appeal or to procuring bail and will also be allowed to have interviews or write letters to his friends once or twice a month or oftener if the Superintendent considers it necessary, to enable him to arrange for the management of his property or other family matters.
(2)Every inmate ordered to be detained in a Borstal Institution in default of furnishing security for good behaviour will be allowed to communicate by letter and have interviews at any reasonable time with his relations or friends for the purpose of arranging for the furnishing of security.
(3)In addition to the privileges mentioned in sub-rules (1) and (2) above every inmate will be allowed to have an interview with his relatives or friends to write and receive a letter as given below :-
(a)In the Ordinary Grade two interviews in the first month of his detention, and thereafter once in two months.
(b)In the Special Grade once in month-and-a-half.
(c)In the Star Grade once in a month.
(d)In the Monitor Grade once in a fortnight.
Provided that the exercise of this privilege will be contingent on good conduct and may be withdrawn or postponed by the Superintendent for bad conduct.Note. - (i) A letter merely arranging an interview will not be counted as a letter for the purposes of this rule.Note. - (ii) An inmate may, with the permission of the Superintendent, substitute a letter with reply for an interview or vice versa.
(4)The Superintendent may at his direction grant interview or allow the despatch of receipt of letters at shorter intervals than provided in sub-rule (3) or in spite of the inmate's misconduct, if he considers that special or urgent grounds exist for such concession, as for example in the event of an inmate being seriously ill, or on the occurrence of the death of a near relative, or if the friends or relatives may come from a distance to see the inmate and it would inflict an undue hardship on them to refuse interview, or if the inmate is nearing release and wishes secure employment, or for other sufficient cause. Matters of importance such as the death of a relative may also be communicated at any time by the friends of an inmate to the Superintendent, who will if he thinks it expedient, inform the inmate of the substance of the communication.
(5)No inmate should be allowed to have an interview or to receive or write a letter, except with the permission of the Superintendent, which shall be recorded in writing.
(6)Application for interviews with inmate may be oral or in writing at the discretion of the Superintendent. If the inmate is not entitled to an interview the application will be informed at once unless the Superintendent has decided to grant the interview under sub-rule (4).
(7)The Superintendent should not allow any visit from any person whom he thinks likely to exercise an undesirable influence upon the inmate.
(8)The time allowed for an interview shall not ordinarily exceed 20 minutes but may be extended by the Superintendent at his discretion.
(9)Every visit should take place in the presence, but not within the hearing of a Borstal Official, who shall if he observes anything unusual and irregular at once put an end to the visit and immediately make a report to the Superintendent.Note - The term "friend or relative" as applied to a prospective interviewer of inmates and as occurring in rule 15 is to be literally and strictly interpreted that is to say, no one should be allowed an interview with an inmate, who is entitled under the rules to interview unless he can submit proof of a personal and intimate acquaintance or of near relationship. In the case of a relative the nature of relationship should be ascertained.