State of Uttarakhand - Act
The Uttarakhand Former Chief Minister facility (Residential and Other Facilities) Act, 2019
UTTARAKHAND
India
India
The Uttarakhand Former Chief Minister facility (Residential and Other Facilities) Act, 2019
Act 5 of 2020
- Published on 13 January 2020
- Commenced on 13 January 2020
- [This is the version of this document from 13 January 2020.]
ANACTWREREAS, keeping in view the facilities provided to former constitutional functiondes. after formation of the State in the year 2000, former Chief-Ministers were provided residential accommodation for life time in accoi.drnce with certain rules/Govt. Orders/OfficeMemorandum/Notification.NOW, THEREFORE, to validate the residential accormnodation and other facilities already provided to fomer Chief Ministers for a fixed period, as one timemeasure and provide residential and other facilities.Be it enacted by the Uttarakhand State 1egislative Assembly in the Seventieth year of the Republic of India as follows:(1)This Act may be called the Uttarakhand Former Chief Minister Facility atesidendal aiid Other Facilities) Act, 2019. (2)It shall be deemed to have come into force from 9th November 2000. (a)"State Government" means the Uttarakhand Government; (b)"Former Chief Minister" means the Chief Minister who has worked in the Council of Ministers in the Uttarkhand Government; (c)"Fees" and "Standard rent" means the fees and standard rent determined by the Uttarakhand Government for residence, electricity, water and other facilities; (d)"Government Residence" means the Government residence available within the municipal corporation and Cantonment area limits of Dehradun (a)The appropriate rent of goverrment residence allotted to the former Chief Minister of Uttarakhand State shall be recovered from the allottee from the date of allotment. EXPLANATION- Appropriate rent for the purposes of this sub section shall be 25 % increases of the standard rent, in addition to standard rent as determined by the Government from time to time.(b)The payment of electricity, water and sewerage fee etc. of the government residence allotted to the former Chief Ministers shall be paid to the concerned department from the date of allotment, by the allottee himself, (c)The facilities provided to the former Chief Ministers by the State Goverrment (vehicle along with driver, P.O.L for the vehicles, maintenance of vehicles, Personal Assistant/Officer on Special Duty/ Public Relation Officer, Fourth class employee, watchman, gardener, telephone attendant, security guard etc.) as detemined by the Government, shall be free of cost. (d)All the facilities provided to the former Chief Ministers shall be permissable (cxcc])t Security Guard) till his occupancy in the government residence. (e)The former chief minister shall be entitled the security and protocol Services as State Goverrment may, determine from time to time. (1)The Uttarakhand Former Chief Minister Facility (Residential and Other Facilities) Ordinance, 2019 is hereby repealed. (2)Notwithslaiiding such repeal anything done or any action taken under the Ordinance shall be deemed to have been done or taken under the corresponding provisions of this act.[In the case of Rural Litigation and Entitlement Kendra v. State of Uttarakhand (2020), Division Bench of Ramesh Ranganathan, CJ and Ramesh Chandra Khulbe, J. declared the Uttarakahand Former Chief Ministers Facility (Residential and other Facilities) Act, 2019 as void as it extended various facilities to former Chief Ministers free of cost and hence suffers from manifest arbitrariness and is ultra vires Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution. The court decided that a Chief Minister after the completion of his/ her term will be a common person and no extra special treatment will be given to them, other than security and other protocols. The Court held that “Conferment of the benefits, of concessional accommodation, and various other facilities being provided free of cost, on the former Chief Ministers is without any adequate determining principles, excessive and grossly disproportionate and must therefore be held to suffer from manifest arbitrariness and to fall foul of Article 14 of the Constitution” The Court rejected the justification given by the Government that the former Chief Ministers had rendered invaluable service as Chief Ministers and, taking into account their contribution and as a reward for the services rendered by them, had extended those benefits after they had resigned office. (https:indiankanoon.org/doc/45114727/, https:www.scconline.com/blog/post/2020/06/12/utt-hc-uttarakhand-former-chief-ministers-facility-residential-and-other-facilities-act-2019-declared-unconstitutional-being-ultra-vires-arts-14-and-21/)]