Delhi High Court - Orders
The Commissioner Of Income Tax - ... vs Shangri-La International Hotel ... on 18 September, 2023
Author: Rajiv Shakdher
Bench: Rajiv Shakdher
$~46 & 49
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ ITA 532/2023
+ ITA 535/2023
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL
TAXATION -3 ..... Appellant
Through: Mr Ruchir Bhatia, Sr Standing
Counsel with Ms Deeksha Gupta,
ssssAdv.
versus
SHANGRI-LA INTERNATIONAL HOTEL
MANAGEMENT PTE LTD. ..... Respondent
Through: Mr Manuj Sabharwal, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
ORDER
% 18.09.2023 [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] CM Appl.47914/2023 in ITA 532/2023
1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
ITA 532/2023 ITA 535/20232. These appeals concern Assessment Years (AYs) 2019-20 [ITA 532/2023] and 2018-19 [ITA 535/2023].
3. In the above captioned appeals, the appellant/revenue seeks to assail a common order dated 28.02.2023 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [in short, "Tribunal"].
4. Broadly, the Tribunal, via the impugned order, has ruled that the reimbursement of expenses qua marketing fees, frequent flyer programme, ITA Nos.532/2023 & 535/2023 1/2 This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/09/2023 at 21:10:35 frequent guest programme and reservation fees received by the respondent/assessee cannot be treated as fee for technical services, in terms of Article 12(4) of the Indo-Singapore DTAA and under Section 9(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [in short, "Act"].
5. Concededly, this issue stands covered by the following judgments:
(i) DIT vs. Sheraton International Inc. (2009), 178 Taxmann 84 (Del.)
(ii) CIT vs. Sheraton International Inc. [decided by this court on 11.05.2023 in ITA 271/2023]
(iii) CIT vs. Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide Inc. 2022:DHC:004730.
6. Therefore, according to us, no substantial questions law arises for consideration.
7. The appeals are accordingly closed.
8. Needless to add, since the appellant/revenue has preferred a Special Leave Petition against the judgment rendered by this court in CIT v Sheraton International Inc., parties will abide by the final decision rendered in that case by the Supreme Court.
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J GIRISH KATHPALIA, J SEPTEMBER 18, 2023/pmc Click here to check corrigendum, if any ITA Nos.532/2023 & 535/2023 2/2 This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/09/2023 at 21:10:35