Supreme Court - Daily Orders
Divya Nair vs Arjun Sasikumar on 4 December, 2020
Author: V. Ramasubramanian
Bench: V. Ramasubramanian
ITEM NO.10 Court 7 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XVI-A
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 83/2019
DIVYA NAIR Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
ARJUN SASIKUMAR Respondent(s)
(FOR IA No.6308/2019-EX-PARTE STAY and IA No. 49352/2019 -
APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS and IA No. 49423/2020 –
CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION and and IA No. 105680/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM
FILING O.T. and IA No. 49424/2020 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and
IA No. 19918/2019 - PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL
DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES and IA No. 30684/2019 - VACATING STAY)
WITH
T.P.(C) No. 463/2019 (XVI-A)
(FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 37085/2019 )
Date : 04-12-2020 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Abhishek Singh, Adv.
Mr. Ranjith K. C., AOR
Mr. Kush Chaturvedi, AOR
For Respondent(s) Mr. Ranjith K. C., AOR
Mr. Kush Chaturvedi, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
The first transfer petition is by the wife seeking transfer of the petition filed by the husband under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 and the second transfer petition is by the husband seeking transfer of a similar petition under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890.
Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by MEENAKSHI KOHLI Date: 2020.12.08 16:53:28 ISTReason: The parties were referred to the Delhi High Court Mediation 1 and Conciliation Centre at Delhi High Court and in the Mediation Centre, the parties reached a settlement.
The Settlement Agreement dated 16.11.2019 reads as follows:
Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre Delhi High Court, Shershah Road, New Delhi Dated 16.11.2019 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT is entered into on 16.11.2019 SMT. DIVYA UDAYBHASKAR NAIR W/O. SH. ARJUN SASIKUMAR R/O 167, VINAYAM, RAMNAGAR, NEAR SONY CENTRE, NAGPUR- 440033, MAHARASHTRA (MOBILE – 9823264230) (FIRST PARTY / PETITIONER / WIFE) AND SH. ARJUN SASIKUMAR, S/O SH. K.SASIKUMAR R/O 35/2616D, ‘DEVADATTA’, RELCON VILLA #3, T.D.SANNIDHI ROAD, THAMMANNAM, KOCHI – 682032, KERALA (MOBILE – 9567090398) (SECOND PARTY/ RESPONDENT/ HUSBAND).
WHEREAS there are two transfer petitions before the Hon’ble Supreme Court filed under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 read with Order XLI of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013. the first petition has been filed by the First Party wife bearing T.P (C) No.83/2019 titled as ‘Divya Nair Vs. Arjun Sasikumar’, seeking Transfer of O.P No.1358/2018 for custody of the child (filed by the Second Party, father) from the Family Court, Ernakulum, Kerala to Family Court, Nagpur, Maharashtra. The Second Petition bearing T.P. (C) No.463/2019 “Arjun Sasikumar Vs. Divya Nair” was filed by the Second Party seeking Transfer of O.P No. D3/2019 for custody of the child (filed by the First Party, mother) from the Family Court, Nagpur, Maharashtra to Family Court, Ernakulum, Kerala. WHEREAS the facts and circumstances leading upto the above transfer petitions are as follows:-
1) The First Party and Second Party were married in accordance with Hindu rules and customs, on 03.11.2011 at the Sree Krishna Inn, Guruvayoor Trichur District, Kerala in the presence of friends and relatives in accordance with the Hindu Marriage Act, 2 1955 and customs of Hindu Nair community. The parties subsequently registered their marriage on 23.02.2012 at the Mannath Bhagavathi Temple, Koduvayoor.
2) Out of this wedlock, the parties were blessed with a son on 25.07.2012 whom they named Advaith Nair.
3) The Second Party had been gainfully employed in the Middle East prior to his mar-
riage to the First Party. The Second Party had, shortly before the wedding resigned from his job to commence a share trading marketing business at Kochi, Kerala. After the parties marriage, the Second Party was appointed as Director in two companies of the First Party’s father in April, 2012, subsequent to which the Second Party relo - cated to Nagpur and began assisting his father-in-law in family business.
4) Disputes and differences arose between the parties following which the Second Party returned to Kochi at the time end of 2013. Despite several attempts including the parties attempting to live together at Kochi, the parties were unable to reconcile their disputes differences. Several attempts were made to mediate between the par- ties herein by relatives and well-wishers. During the course of attempts at re-concili - ation, the Family Court, Ernakulam passed a judgment and decree in O.P(G&W) No.1358/2017 recording that the matter had been settled between the parties and the compromise duly executed had been filed. Under the said settlement agreement the custody of the minor son of the parties was mutually given to the Second Party, father.
5) Unfortunately, the said settlement agreement did not finally end the disputes and dif- ferences between the parties and led to the filing of the following litigations:-
I. List of Cases filed by the First Party against the Second Party
(i) Custody Petition filed by the First Party bearing No. O.P D3/2019 filed before the Family Courts, Nagpur.
(ii) First Party filed FIR bearing 1056 of 2018 under u/s 509 IPC, 67 IT Act 120(o) Kerala Police Act being Petition No. Cr. No. 1056/2018 filed with Palarivattom Police Station, Ernakulam, Kochi.
II. List of cases filed by the Second Party against the First Party 3
(i) OP No. 1358/2017 before the Family Court, Ernakulam
(ii) Complaint dated 30.06.2017 before the Commissioner of Police, Kochi
(iii) Complaint and F.I.R No. 1696/2018 before the Palarivattom Police Station, Kerala
(iv) F.I.R No. 44/2019 at the Pazhayannur Police Station, Kerala.
AND WHEREAS the two custody petitions referred in paras I and II above namely OP D3/2019 filed by the First Party against the Second Party at Nagpur and OP 1358/2017 filed by the Second Party against the First Party at Kochi came up for hearing before the Hon’ble Supreme Court vide Transfer Petitions filed by both parties.
AND WHEREAS vide Order dated 05.07.2019, the Hon’ble Supreme Court appointed Ms.Sadhana Ramachandran, Advocate/ Mediator, Supreme Court Mediation Centre as Mediator in the present mediation proceedings.
AND WHEREAS with the consent of the parties and their respective counsel, it was agreed that all mediation sessions will be conducted at Samadhan (Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre).
AND WHEREAS comprehensive mediation sessions were held on 29.07.2019, 30.07.2019, 14.08.2019, 19.08.2019, 20.08.2019, 28.08.2019, 29.08.2019, 30.08.2019, 06.09.2019, 13.09.2019, 04.11.2019, 06.11.2019, 13.11.2019 and 16.11.2019 jointly and separately between the parties and learned counsel for the parties.
AND WHEREAS during the course of mediation, the parties resolved not to continue their marriage and have decided to dissolve their marriage by mutual consent under the following settlement terms:-
A. Settlement in the Welfare and Interest of the Child i. It is agreed between the parties they are entering into this Settlement Agree-
ment to peacefully resolve their disputes and differences and move on in life with their primary concern being the welfare and interest of their son Advaith Nair who is presently 7 years old and who deserves to grow to his fullest po-4
tential physically, emotionally, educationally and socially and has the com-
pany, guidance and love of both parents.
B. Divorce by Mutual Consent
i) It is agreed between the parties that they shall jointly apply before the Hon’ble
Supreme Court of India praying for grant of a decree of divorce by mutual consent on the next effective date of hearing.
ii) In the event the Hon’ble Supreme Court is not pleased to grant the prayer of decree of divorce by mutual consent on the next effective date of hearing, it is agreed between the parties that in pursuance of their mutual decision to dis-
solve their marriage, they shall file a Divorce Petition under Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage Act before the concerned Family Court at Ernakulam.
iii) It is agreed between the parties that in the event that the first motion is filed under Section 13 B (1) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 before the Family Court at Ernakulam, Kerala it shall be done on or before 15 th of December 2019. It is further agreed between the parties that once the first motion is filed before the Family Court at Ernakulam, Kerala, they will request the concerned Family Court at Ernakulam, Kerala to exempt the cooling period to file the Second motion.
C. Custody of the Child
Custody with the Second Party/ father
i) It is agreed between the parties that the custody of the child Advaith aged 7
years till he completes the age of 14 shall exclusively and solely vest with the Second Party. It is further agreed between the parties that the First Party af- ter the execution of this settlement will not claim any custody right over child till he finishes Class 9 in the custody of the Second Party and both parties will withdraw their respective Custody Petitions filed before the Family Courts, Nagpur and Ernakulam.
ii) It is further agreed between the parties that after he finishes class 9 in the custody of the father since he will be 14 years old, the child’s preference will be taken for his further choice of residence/place of education. It is further 5 agreed between the parties that the child will be allowed to continue his stud-
ies at the location and under the custody of the parent in accordance with his preference.
iii) It is agreed between the parties that when the child is in the custody of the ei -
ther party, the child shall be allowed privacy to speak to the other party with- out any hindrance or disturbance from the custodian party or his/her family member.
iv) It is agreed between the parties that the at all times they will both ensure that the child is in touch with both his parents irrespective of the parent who has the custody.
v) It is agreed between the parties that till the child attains majority, the parent who has custody of the child will keep possession of the passport and other documents of the child safely and ensure that if either parent has planned to take the child abroad, the other parent will extend all possible help in respect of the passport and other documents of the child as and when necessary.
vi) It is agreed between the parties that in case the child is unable to meet the non-custodial parent due to illness, exams or other engagements, the meet- ing right of the non-custodial parent would be carried forward and amicably rearranged between the parents. It is further agreed between the parties that prior intimation of any such illness as and when it occurs shall be given to the non-custodial parent. However, it is made clear that the will of the child will be paramount importance.
vii) It is further agreed between the parties that in case the child expresses his desire to meet either parent beyond the scheduled meetings, both parents shall cooperate and extend all possible help in facilitating such meetings.
viii) It is agreed between the parties that the First Party shall handover the child Advaith to the custody of his father today i.e. 16.11.2019.
D. Visitation rights of the First Party mother, when the child is in the custody of the father.
It is agreed between the parties that when the child is in the custody of the father, 6 the mother shall have the following visitation rights and access to the child:-
i) It is agreed between the parties that when the child is in the custody of the Second Party, the First Party shall have a right to meet the child ev-
ery 3rd weekend of the month (Friday 8 p.m to Sunday 4 p.m). It is fur- ther agreed between the parties that this arrangement of visitation dur- ing the 3rd weekend will not apply in the months when the First Party mother gets visitation of the child for vacations, irrespective of the dates. It is also hereby agreed between the parties that the First Party/ mother shall have the right to take Advaith within a reasonable dis- tance from Kochi, preferably within 600 kms from Kochi. It is agreed between the parties that the First Party shall stick to the Friday 8 p.m to Sunday 4 p.m visitation schedule and ensure the child is back to Kochi by 4 p.m.
ii) It is agreed between the parties that the visitation/weekend custody of the child shall not interfere with the examinations/ academic interests of the child, and that in such an eventuality, both parents shall mutually agree on an alternate weekend for visitation.
iii) It is further agreed between the parties that if the child in enrolled for academic or extra-curricular coaching/ training, while the First Party/ mother has visitation on weekends, the Second Party/ father alone shall take the child to attend such coaching/ training at the appropriate time and drop him back with the First Party/ mother immediately after such coaching/ training.
iv) It is agreed between the parties that both parties shall have free access to the child through telephone/SMS/E-mail/Facetime/Skype/Whatsapp/ Video conferencing etc when the custody of the child is with the other parent. It is further agreed between the parties that the First Party/ mother shall have the right to attend parent-teacher meetings and school events of the child, and that she shall inform the Second Party/ father at- least 2 days in advance of her plans.
v) It is further agreed between the parties that both parents shall be sen-
sitive to the child’s school hours and the First Party will not speak to 7 the Child on the phone/email/SMS during his school time. It is further agreed between the parties that when the child is in the custody of the Second Party, the father also will not disturb the child on the phone/email/SMS during his school time.
vi) It is agreed between the parties that when the child is in the custody of the father, his summer vacations shall be divided between the parents in terms of 60% time with the mother and 40% time with the father. It is further agreed between the parties that the dates of the respective time with the respective parents shall be decided mutually between the par- ents and communicated to each other prior to the handover of the child to the First Party. It is also agreed between the parties that during the Vishu Holiday which falls in the second week of April, the custody of the child shall be alternatively arranged between both the parties for the period of one week which shall be inclusive of the share of custody for the summer vacation in the 60:40 ratio. It is agreed between the parties that the arrangement of Advaith’s Vishu holiday shall begin from 2020 when Advaith shall spend Vishu with Second Party father. Ac- cordingly, Advaith shall spend Vishu of 2021 with the First Party mother. It is further agreed between the parties that the date of the re- turn of the child to the Second Party shall be agreed upon prior to the change of visitation from the Second Party to the First Party and the First Party shall not unilaterally make any changes to such date what- soever without the consent of the Second Party with atleast 10 days prior intimation. It is further agreed between the parties
vii) It is further agreed between the parties that the two major vacations of the child which is Onam (in September for 7-8 days) and Christmas/New year (in December – January for 7-8 days) shall be shared alternatively between the parents so that in the year when the child is spending Onam with the mother, he spends Christmas/ New Year with the father and vice-n-versa. It is agreed between the parties that Advaith shall spend Christmas 2019 with Second Party Father and Onam 2020 with the First Party mother. The rest of the agreed ar- rangement shall follow.
8viii) It is further agreed between the parties that if the child spends Onam vacations with the mother in one year, he shall spend the Onam vaca- tions in the following year with his father, and vice versa.
ix) It is agreed between the parties that when the First Party is having the custody for the Holidays which is other than the Summer Vacations, she shall drop the child to Kochi one day prior to re-opening of his school.
x) It is agreed between the parties that all future matters relating to the custody of the child shall lie within the jurisdiction of the Family Court, Ernakulam, Kerala.
E. Visitation rights of the Second Party father, when the child is in the custody of the mother.
i) It is agreed between the parties that both parties shall have free access to the child through telephone/ SMS /E-mail/ Facetime/ Skype/ Whatsapp/ Video con- ferencing etc when the custody of the child is with the First Party.
F. The Child’s Birthday:
i) It is agreed between the parties that the child Advaith shall spend his birthday which falls on 25th July as follows:-
The First Party mother shall come to Kochi and spend some time with Advaith on his birthday. If the birthday is on a school day the First Party mother shall spend the evening with Advaith. If the birthday falls on weekend or holiday both the parties shall divide the day for celebration of Advaith’s birthday in accor- dance with their mutual convenience. It is further agreed between the parties that any birthday celebrations of Advaith shall not disturb his school attendance and studies. It is therefore agreed between the parties that both parents shall ensure that the Birthday celebrations of Advaith are held properly on a conve - nient weekend around his birthday.
G. Responsibilities of both parties:
i) It is agreed between the parties that when the First Party wishes to take the 9 child aboard or to any place in India during her tenure of visitation, she shall share the complete details of the country and place they are visiting, copy of the air tickets, visa details as well as details of the stay with the other party. The First Party shall ensure that the Second Party and the child stay in touch during such time over telephone /sms/email/whatsapp/facetime/ video calling etc. It is also agreed between the parties that this provision of visitation shall come into effect from December, 2019.
ii) It is further agreed between the parties that the passport of the minor child Advaith Nair will bear the name of both father and mother for all times to come.
iii) It is further agreed between the parties that for the visitation period of the First Party with her child, the mother shall pick up Advaith from Kochi and the Second Party/ father shall bring back Advaith from Nagpur. It is further agreed between the parties that the parent picking up the child shall bear all the travel expenses of the child and themselves. It is further agreed between the parties that the responsibility of the maintenance of the child during the visitation period shall be with the First Party mother.
iv) It is further agreed between the parties that at all times both parents shall make every endeavour to ensure that the child’s movement from one parent to the other is done peacefully and smoothly without any emotional problem being caused to the child.
v) It is further agreed between the parties that while the child’s visitation is with the First Party, she shall ensure that the child is not sent for academic tuitions and is helped in his studies by the First Party.
vi) It is further agreed between the parties that if the child is enrolled for extra-
curricular coaching/training while his custody is with the First Party, she shall ensure that the same may be continued without any hindrance wherever the child is located.
vii) It is further agreed between the parties that while the child is with the Second Party, the First Party shall have access to the child through the Second Party’s parents telephone, whatsapp, video calling, skype etc since the Second Party’s schedule might not allow the First Party to comfortably talk to the child after his school hours.
H. Permanent alimony, Maintenance and Stridhan 10
i) It is agreed between the parties that the principal amount of Rs. 15,00,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Lakhs only) owed by the company in which the father of the First Party is the Chairman to the Second Party shall be paid by the father of the First Party to the Second Party on or before 31st December, 2019 vide cheque No. 74319 drawn on Bank of Maharashtra, Laxmi Nagar Branch, Nagpur in the name of Arjun Sasikumar Nair.
ii) It is agreed between the parties that the following portions of land shall be transferred towards settlement of maintenance and permanent al- imony by the Second Party to the First Party and her nominees Mr. Uday Bhaskar and Mr. Siddarthan P.:
All lands described below are in Village: Kaniyarkode, Taluka: Tha- lapilly District: Thrissur, State: Kerala.
a. Land in the name of Arjun Sasikumar having title vide Sale Deed:
1049/2012, Thandaper No: 9722 having land extent of 1.6421 hectares b. Land in the name of K. Sasikumar (father of the Second Party) having title vide Sale Deed: 1050/2012, Thandaper No: 9720 having land extent of 1.3011 hectares c. Land in the name of Praveena Sasikumar (mother of the Second Party) having title vide Sale Deed: 1048/2012, Thandaper No: 9721 having land extent of 1.9990 hectares.
d. The original documents regarding the portion of land owned by the First Party which are presently in the Second Party’s custody shall be handed over to the First Party on or before the date of registration of land.
iii) It is agreed between the parties that the land referred to in G (ii) a in the name of the Second Party shall be transferred by the Second Party by way of gift to the First Party on or before 22.11.2019.
iv) It is agreed between the parties that the land referred to in G (ii) b in the name of the K. Sasikumar (father of the Second Party) shall be transferred by K. Sasikumar by way of sale to Udaybhaskar Nair (fa-
11ther of the First Party) for a consideration of Rs. 6,75,000/- (Rupees Six Lakhs Seventy Five Thousand only) vide cheque bearing No. 87988 drawn on the Federal Bank Limited, Nagpur in the name of K. Sasikumar on or before 22.11.2019.
v) It is agreed between the parties that the land referred to in G (ii) c in the name of the Praveena Sasikumar (mother of the Second Party) shall be transferred by Praveena Sasikumar by way of sale to the nom- inee of the First Party namely Siddharthan P. for a consideration of Rs. 8,00,000/- (Rupees Eight Lakhs only) vide cheque bearing No. 886232 drawn on the State Bank of India, Palakkad in the name of Praveena Sasikumar on or before 22.11.2019.
vi) It is agreed between the parties that the First Party shall complete all formalities on her behalf and cooperate with the Second Party to close the S/B Account No. 50100128235441 opened in the joint names with the Second Party and operated with HDFC Bank, Jawahar Nagar, Kochi. It is further agreed between the parties that the First Party has no claims or liability on the amount held in such account upon closure.
vii) It is further agreed between the parties that the First Party shall pre-
pare all documentation and complete all formalities for the transfer of ownership of the land referred to in para (v) above. It is further agreed between the parties that all costs/ taxes/ duties/ fees of such transfer shall be borne by the First Party, and that the Second Party shall not be liable for any of the same. It is also agreed between the parties that after the sale documentation is cleared by legal opinion for the Second Party, the First Party shall make necessary arrangements and facilitate the transfer within 10 days of such confirmation.
viii) It is agreed between the parties that the land owned by the Second Party and his parents are valued substantially higher, and that the First Party thereby surrenders all claims, present and future, on ac- count of alimony/ maintenance/ stridhan etc against the Second Party, and that the First Party shall have no claim of any sort, against the Second Party in future over the movable and immovable property of the Second Party and his family members.
12I. Actions by both parties to end litigations pending between them:
TABLE Sr. Title & Case No. Filed Status Action to be taken No. by
1. Custody Petition First Pending The First Party with the bearing no. O.P. Party filing of the First Motion D3/2019 filed before will withdraw, her the Family Courts , Petitions bearing O.P. Nagpur D3/2019 titled Divya Nair versus Arjun SasiKumar (Custody Petition) filed before the Family Court, Nagpur.
2a. FIR bearing 1056 of First Pending The Second Party and 2018 under u/s 509 Party the First Party shall IPC, 67 IT Act, 120(o) jointly move an Kerala Police Act appropriate petition for being Petition No. Cr getting the said FIR No. 1056/2018 filed No. 1056/2018 quashed with Palarivattom from the Hon’ble High Police Station, Court at Kochi and Ernakulam, Kochi. complaint on the same grounds at Ambazari 2b. Same complaint filed First Pending Police Station, Nagpur.
at Ambazari police Party Since the FIR was filed
station, Nagpur due to a mistake of fact
by the First Party. The
Second Party agrees
and undertakes to
cooperate with the First
Party in this regard.
3. Second Party was First Pending wife will also handover to
made the guarantor Party the husband a Non-
for a loan of Rs 4.5 Liability Certificate
crore taken by a issued by Sunderlal
company owned by Sawji Cooperative Bank
her father i.e. Shri Nagpur, releasing the
Udaybhaskar Nair Husband of the liability
from Sunderlal Sawji
Co-operative Bank,
Nagpur in 2015.
4. Complaint dated Second Pending The Second Party
02.05.2016before the Party agrees to withdraw the
Commissioner of said complaint from the
Police, Kochi. Police Station.
13
5. OP No. 1358/2017 Second Pending The present case shall before the Family Party cease to exist once the Court, Ernakulam settlement is arrived at by the parties. The present transfer petition arises out of the said case.
6. Complaint dated Second Pending The Second Party 30.06.2017 before the Party agrees to withdraw the Commissioner of said complaint from the Police, Kochi Police Station.
7. Complaint and F.I.R Second Pending The First Party shall before the Party move an appropriate Palarivattom Police application for quashing Station, Kerala. of the said FIR before the Hon’ble High Court at Kochi. The Second Party undertakes to cooperate with the First Party.
8. F.I.R No. 44/2019 at Second Pending The Second Party and the Pazhayannur Party the First Party shall Police Station, Kerala. jointly move an appropriate petition for getting the said FIR No. 44/2019 quashed from the Hon’ble High Court at Kochi. Since the FIR was filed due to a mistake of fact by the Second Party. The First Party agrees and undertakes to cooperate with the Second Party in this regard.
Prayer to the Hon’ble Supreme Court regarding actions to be taken by both parties to end litigation pending between them:-
i) That the above mentioned cases/litigations mentioned at para I, column No.2 and column No.8 may be quashed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in light of the present Settlement Agreement arrived at between the parties.
ii) That the complaints filed at para I, column No. 4, 6 and 7 may also be quashed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in light of the present Settlement Agreement arrived at between the parties.14
iii) Any other relief as the Hon’ble Supreme Court deems just and fit in the wel-
fare of the child and in interest of both the parties.
J. It is agreed between the parties that in case the Second Party after signing of the Settlement Agreement and subsequently taking the custody of child under the terms of this Settlement Agreement does not honour any of the remaining terms of the present Settlement Agreement specifically in relation to the transfer of land, the Second Party shall voluntarily give up his rights to the custody of the child perma - nently. It is further agreed between the parties that in case, the First Party does not honour the payments as mentioned above, in respect of the transfer of the land, the First Party shall voluntarily give up her rights of visitation permanently. It is further agreed between the parties that this term shall become applicable provided both parties complete all formalities required to be done at their respective ends in terms of documentation, registration and any other necessary formality.
It is further agreed between the parties that the Second Party shall give an affidavit before the Hon’ble Supreme Court stating his desire to willingly give up his rights of the custody of the child permanently in case he defaults in honouring the term pertaining to the transfer of lands as mentioned hereinabove. It is agreed between the parties that neither party shall seek any rectification/ modification/ alteration/ or setting aside of the present Settlement Agreement during custody or visitation of the child Advaith.
K. Applicability of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
I) It is further agreed between the parties that any breach of any term of the present Settlement Agreement by any party shall attract proceedings under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
II) The parties further agree that the terms and conditions stipulated in this set-
tlement agreement regarding shall be taken as their undertakings to the Hon’ble Supreme Court and in case of any default by anyone, the defaulting party shall be held for contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. III) It is further agreed between the parties that they shall, on their own behalf and on behalf of the parties they represent, undertake before the Hon’ble 15 Supreme Court to abide by all terms of this Settlement Agreement failing which proceedings under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 shall be attracted. IV) The terms covered under the Settlement Agreement which, if not adhered to by either party, shall attract proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 are as follows:
Settlement in the Welfare and Interest of the Child Divorce by Mutual Consent Custody of the Child Custody with the Second Party/ father Visitation rights of the First Party mother, when the child is in the custody of the father Visitation rights of the Second Party father, when the child is in the custody of the mother The Childs Birthday Responsibilities of both parties Permanent alimony, Maintenance and Stridhan Actions by both parties to end litigations pending between them.
Failure to adhere with any of the above mentioned settlement terms shall attract proceedings under the Contempts of Courts Act, 1971.
L. Parties undertaking not to misuse social or any other media:-
I) It is undertaken by the parties that they shall not to interfere in each other’s peaceful life henceforth and respect each other’s privacy.
II) It is further undertaken by both the parties that they shall not use social media like whatsapp, facebook, twitter, skype, instragram etc platforms to share any part of this Settlement Agreement or to put any derogatory, harmful, abusing or damaging remarks and or content regarding each other or each other’s family members. Any attempt to put any such content on social media shall attract proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The parties agree that this undertaking shall be deemed to be and taken as an undertaking before the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
By signing this Settlement Agreement the parties hereto state that they shall have no 16 further claims or demands against each other and all the disputes and differences have been amicably settled by the Parties hereto through the process of Mediation, as embodied in the Settlement Agreement.
That the parties undertake that they are bound by this Settlement Agreement and to abide by the terms and conditions set out in the agreement and not to dispute the same hereinafter in future.
PARTIES SIGNATURES Divya Udaybhaskar Nair (Petitioner/Wife/Mother) Arjun Sasikumar (Respondent/Husband/Father) WITNESS SIGNATURES Udaybhaskar Nair (Father of the First Party) Rajinder Singh (Friend of the Second Party) COUNSEL’S SIGNATURES Mr. Ranjith K.C., Advocate on Record for the First Party Enrol No. K/101/1997 and Mr. Abhishek Singh, Enrl.No. D/2808/2016 Advocates for the First Party Mr. Akhil Abraham Roy, Enrol No. D/2708/2016 on behalf of K.J. John & Co.
Advocate for the Second Party 17 (Sadhana Ramachandran) Mediator Unfortunately after the parties reached a settlement agreement, lot of disputes arose with regard to enforcement of the terms agreed to between the parties. Therefore, on the last occasion, when the transfer petitions came up for hearing, I directed the learned counsel for the parties to give a list of obligations pending on both sides. Today, the learned counsel on either side pointed out that all financial obligations agreed between the parties have been fully and finally discharged and both of them do not have any further or other financial obligations against each other.
The learned counsel on both sides also agree that the properties, to be conveyed as per the settlement agreement, have also been conveyed and both the parties have no claim against each other in respect of any properties.
Learned counsel submits that five cases are now pending between the parties. The first is the custody petition bearing No. O.P. D3/2019 filed by the wife before the Family Court, Nagpur, the second is a petition filed by the husband in O.P. No. 1358/2017 before the Family Court, Ernakulam for the custody of the child, the third is a police complaint filed in Case Crime No. 1056/2018 before the Palarivattom Police Station, Ernakulam, Kochi for the alleged offences under Sections 509 of the Indian Penal Code, 67 of the Information and Technology Act and 120(o) of the Kerala Police Act against the husband for the alleged defamatory comments on the 18 social media, the fourth is the complaint in FIR No. 1696/2018 before the Palarivattom Police Station, Kerala and the fifth is another criminal complaint in FIR No. 44/2019 registered at Pazhayannur Police Station, Kerala filed by the husband against the wife.
Since the parties have reached a settlement agreement, both the child custody petitions filed under the Guardians and Wards Act shall stand disposed of in terms of the agreement reached between the parties on 16.11.2019.
All the police complaints filed against one another shall stand closed in view of the settlement agreement with a direction to the police to close the FIRs. There is one more criminal complaint lodged by the husband in FIR No. 71/2020 before Maradu Police Station, Ernakulam against the wife and others under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act.
It appears that the police have already filed a closure report. The learned counsel for the husband states that the husband is prepared to accept the closure report without conceding the findings recorded therein by the police. This is to ensure that no further action is taken by the wife on the basis of the findings recorded by the Investigation Officer. Since the parties cannot have a dispute after a settlement agreement is reached, it is recorded that the closure report shall be treated as final and the complaint in FIR No. 71/2020 is closed with a view to give an effect to the settlement agreement in true letter and spirit without any findings recorded therein affecting any of the parties.
There are two more things remaining to be done. The first is 19 to file a joint application seeking dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce by consent and the second thing that remains to be done is to provide interim custody of the child to the wife during Christmas vacation.
In order to encourage the parties to honour their commitments under the agreement and not to create any further problems between them, I keep both these transfer petitions pending. The husband shall hand over the custody of the child to the wife on 19.12.2020 and the wife shall return the custody of the child to the husband on 01.01.2021. During this period, the child shall be with the mother.
These transfer petitions may be called immediately after the Court re-opens after Christmas vacation. On the next date of hearing, both parties may file a joint application for divorce by mutual consent. The parties shall bear in mind that unless this arrangement is worked out by both of them smoothly, their application for dissolution of divorce will be in jeopardy and it may not be viewed in the light of the settlement agreement.
(MEENAKSHI KOHLI) (RENU KAPOOR)
ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS BRANCH OFFICER
20