Interglobe Aviation Limited (Indigo) vs Dr. S.M. Kantikar on 8 January, 2015
STATE
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA
First
Appeal ... Road, Gurgaon through its
Managing Director.
Appellant-Opposite
Party
Versus
Dr. S.M. Kantikar R/o D-9, Tower 8, New Moti
Bagh, New Delhi
S.M. Kantikar vs Inter Globe Aviation (Indigo) on 8 July, 2015
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION NEW DELHI REVISION PETITION ... Appeal No. 953/2014 of the State Commission Haryana) 1. DR. S.M. KANTIKAR R/O D-9 TOWER-8.
NEW MOTI BAGH,
NEW DELHI
Ananthapur
Town . ...Respondent
BEFORE :
HONBLE
MR.JUSTICE J.M.MALIK, PRESIDING MEMBER
HONBLE
DR.S.M.KANTIKAR, MEMBER
For the Petitioner : Mr.
Sagar Saxena, Advocate ... parties shall bear their own costs.
...
(J. M. MALIK,J.)
PRESIDING MEMBER
...
(S. M. KANTIKAR)
Mss MEMBER
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
REVISION
extent of salary drawn
by Dr. S.M. Kantikar, a Non-Judicial Member. The aforesaid letter dated
April 13, 2016 has been passed ... Rule 11(1A) (a) of the
Consumer Protection Rules, 1987. Dr. S.M.Kantikar also joined as a
Member of the NCDRC on March
heard by the Division Bench presiding by Hon'ble Dr. S.M Kantikar, Presiding Member and Hon'ble Mr. Dinesh Singh, Member ... same opinion. However, the other Member, Hon'ble Dr. S.M. Kantikar had deferred from this finding, as he was of the opinion that
heard by the Division Bench presiding by Hon'ble Dr. S.M Kantikar, Presiding Member and Hon'ble Mr. Dinesh Singh, Member ... same opinion. However, the other Member, Hon'ble Dr. S.M. Kantikar had deferred from this finding, as he was of the opinion that
heard by the Division Bench presiding by Hon'ble Dr. S.M Kantikar, Presiding Member and Hon'ble Mr. Dinesh Singh, Member ... same opinion. However, the other Member, Hon'ble Dr. S.M. Kantikar had deferred from this finding, as he was of the opinion that
lodged by ASM Birur by Dr. S.M. Kantikar in which he has mentioned the time as 5.15 a.m. If the train was running ... this complaint was not in contemplation of any one including Dr. S.M. Kantikar. From the above, it is clear that RW-3 has deliberately
Vivek
Pal Respondent
BEFORE:
HONBLE MR.JUSTICE J. M. MALIK , PRESIDING MEMBER
HONBLE DR. S. M. KANTIKAR, MEMBER
For
the Petitioner : Mr. Anil K. Kher ... S.M. KANTIKAR
Issue notice to both
the parties to argue the matter on 19.08.2013.
...
(J. M. MALIK,J.)
PRESIDING MEMBER
...
(S. M. KANTIKAR
Jaunpur (UP) Respondents
BEFORE:
HONBLE
MR.JUSTICE J. M. MALIK, PRESIDING MEMBER
HONBLE DR. S. M. KANTIKAR, MEMBER
For
the Petitioner ... s : Mr. U.C. Mittal, Advocate
For the Respondent : Mr. S.D. Singh, Advocate
Pronounced On September 10 , 2013
ORDER
PER DR. S.M. KANTIKAR
