2017/CAT/BANGALORE BENCH
erroneous ought to have been challenged before the CAT in an
independent proceedings not by continuing the contempt
proceedings. Secondly ... 2017/CAT/BANGALORE BENCH
matter and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
Accordingly, the order passed by the CAT in contempt
proceedings
counsel for the petitioner
that the aforesaid observations made by the CAT in contempt proceedings
has virtually diluted the efficacy of the interim order passed ... CAT while deciding the matter
finally on merit may not be influenced by any observation made by the CAT
in the contempt proceedings. As regards
whereby the High court has restored the contempt proceedings before
the Central Administrative Tribunal (for short `CAT’) by setting
aside the order ... dated 16.02.2022 whereby the contempt proceedings
has been closed by the CAT.
The contempt proceedings is initiated by the respondents
to implement the earlier order
provisions of the Section 17 of
AT. Act 1985 with Contempt of Courts (CAT Rules 1992) Le
second group of CPs herein.
5, During ... application for contempt of court under the provisions of the
Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 as well as The Contempt of
Courts (CAT) Rules
transferred to the Central Administrative Tribunal,
Jammu Bench, (CAT) vide order dated 29.07.2020, as such, this
contempt petition may also be transferred ... CAT.
In view of the above, this contempt petition is transferred to the
CAT and to be taken up on 17.04.2023 and the parties shall
writ
petition already stands transferred to Central Administrative Tribunal
(CAT) Jammu Bench, however, the present contempt petition ... also
required to be transferred to Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT)
Jammu. Let this contempt petition be transferred to Central
Administrative Tribunal (CAT) Jammu.
a. Registry
passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Allahabad Bench, Allahabad on 31.03.2005.
Against the order of the CAT, writ petition was filed by the Union ... remedy of filing contempt application under Section 17 before the CAT, the present contempt application is not maintainable and the same stands dismissed.
Order Date
which is supported by Contempt of Courts (CAT) Rules, 1992 and
Contempt of Court Act, 1971 . Nowhere in these Rules, any such provision
is provided ... 2013 Mahavir Prasad Vs.
CAT Lucknow an Others) upheld an order dated 13.9.2012 passed
by CAT, Lucknow Bench in Civil Contempt Petition No. 22/2009
April, 2023
1
CP.No.170/00015/2023/CAT/BANGALORE
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
BANGALORE BENCH, BENGALURU
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.170/00015/2023
IN
ORIGINAL APPLICATION ... advised.
3
CP.No.170/00015/2023/CAT/BANGALORE
5. Contempt proceedings are dropped. Contempt Petition
stands closed reserving liberty to the petitioner to challenge
April, 2023
1
CP.No.170/00008/2023/CAT/BANGALORE
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
BANGALORE BENCH, BENGALURU
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.170/00008/2023
IN
ORIGINAL APPLICATION ... advised.
3
CP.No.170/00008/2023/CAT/BANGALORE
5. Contempt proceedings are dropped. Contempt Petition
stands closed reserving liberty to the petitioner to challenge
