marksheets.
1.1. Acting in good faith, the petitioner submitted a formal
whistleblower complaint on 26.10.2024, at approximately 2:21 p.m. via
email addressed ... respondent No.8 -
Chairman, Audit Committee, CanFin Homes, elaborating on his
whistleblower allegations and enclosing evidence of recruitment
irregularities. In response, an Inquiry Officer
Whistleblowers' Association vs The Union Of India & Ors on 20 April, 2026
20.04.2026
Item ... Whistleblowers' Association
Vs.
The Union of India & Ors.
Mr. Sabyasachi Chatterjee
Mr. Risabh Ahmed Khan
..... For the Petitioner
DICTATED BY SUJOY PAUL
Whistleblowers Association vs Union Of India And Ors on 27 April, 2026
Ct.No.1 D/L 27.04.2026
28
Saikat
Mukherjee
WPA(P)/187/2026 ... WHISTLEBLOWERS ASSOCIATION
VS.
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
Mr. Rishabh Ahmad Khan, Adv.
...For the Petitioner
Mr. Nilanjan Bhattacharjee, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Guddu Singh
Whistleblowers Association vs Union Of India & Ors on 13 May, 2026
13.05.2026
Item ... Whistleblowers Association
VS.
Union of India & Ors.
Mr. Sabyasachi Chatterjee
Mr. Rishabh Ahmad Khan .... For Petitioners
Mr. Nilanjan Bhattacharya
Mr. Guddu Singh
Whistleblowers Association vs Union Of India & Ors on 19 May, 2026
19.05.2026
Item ... Whistleblowers Association
VS.
Union of India & Ors.
Dictated by PARTHA SARATHI SEN, J.:-
1. None appears for the parties.
2. Let the matter
represent
him before Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and he filed a
Whistleblower complaint to the SEC through US counsel, describing the
alleged bribery ... Securities Exchange Act, 1934 establishing
statutory whistleblower programme and the award was granted only
where enforcement action resulted in monetary sanction exceeding USD
1 million
continuously harassed and
illegally terminated by the defendants for being a
whistleblower on fraudulent business practices by the
defendant No.1 in connivance with other ... said fraud. The plaintiff has
blown the whistle as per the whistleblower policy of the
defendant No.1 and accordingly, he had complained the
above
being matter relating to revenue and therefore, the application of the
complainant/whistleblower to be impleaded cannot be allowed.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner ... rejecting the application for impleadment of the
present petitioner, who is whistleblower in the matter and the basic proceedings
before the Collector of stamp
seen that the emails are received by
Plaintiff from the email id :
whistleblower[email protected]
whereas whatsapp messages are received from unknown number
beginning ... John Doe / unknown person and operating through aforesaid
email id
whistleblower[email protected] whereas Defendant
No.2 is Proton AG, the email service provider
seen that the emails are received by
Plaintiff from the email id :
whistleblower[email protected]
whereas whatsapp messages are received from unknown number
beginning ... John Doe / unknown person and operating through aforesaid
email id
whistleblower[email protected] whereas Defendant
No.2 is Proton AG, the email service provider
