dated 23.03.2023 passed under Section 204 Cr.P.C. to face trial under Sections 406 , 504 , 506 IPC.
3. It is the case ... Bombay High Court pointed out that:-
?To constitute an offence under Section 504 , I.P.C. it is sufficient if the insult
passed under Section 204 Cr.P.C., whereby they have been summoned for offence under Sections 384 , 504 , 506 I.P.C. in Complaint Case ... Cr.P.C. that even they are considered to be true in their entirety, still ingredients of offences under Sections 384 , 504 , 506
Moti Lal vs. Mabood Raza, under Sections-394, 504 and 506 of Indian Penal Code , Police Station-Mahrauni, District-Lalitpur, passed by the Additional Sessions ... Moti Lal vs. Mabood Raza, under Sections-394, 504 and 506 of Indian Penal Code , Police Station-Mahrauni, District-Lalitpur, passed by the Additional Sessions
High Court pointed out that:-
"To constitute an offence under Section 504 , I.P.C. it is sufficient if the insult ... Section 503 IPC as punishable under Section 506 IPC are not made out.
18. So far as allegation under Section 504 IPC
Cr.P.C. the case could not proceed as a police case in respect of an offence punishable under Section 504 I.P.C. Because ... offence under Section 504 . I.P.C . Is non-cognizable and so the case could proceed only as a complaint case in view
fresh order dated 07.01.2023, whereby applicants being summoned under Sections 406 , 504 I.P.C. The said order was challenged by applicants ... committed, however, basic ingredients to summon the applicants under Sections 406 and 504 I.P.C. are not present.
5. Learned counsel for applicants
Section 200 and 202 Cr.P.C., applicant has been summoned to face trial under Sections 406 , 504 , 506 IPC. The impugned order ... Bombay High Court pointed out that:?
?To constitute an offence under Section 504 , I.P.C. it is sufficient if the insult
Shishr Jaiswal Vs. Ritesh Gupta) u/s 498/504 I.P.C ., Police Station- George Town, District- Allahabad, including the entire proceedings of the case ... 504 ????????? ?? ???????? ?????? ???? ???? ???? ???? ??? ??????? ????? ????? ?????? ???? ???????? ?????? ?????? ???????? ?????? 17.06.2016 ?? ??? ???
(???????? ???)
??? ????? ??????? ??????????,
???? ???6 ?????????"
6. Learned counsel for applicant submits that even after considering statement of complainant, basic ingredients of Sections 498 and 504
504,506,120B IPC , ????????? ?????, ???????? ???? ? ????? ??? ?? ????- 420,120B, 504,506 IPC ?????????? ???????? ????????, ??? ????????, ????? ???? ????????, ?????????? ?????, ?????? ????? ???? ?? ???? 34,35,420, 467, 468, 504, 506, 120B IPC , ? ??????? ??? ?? ????- 504,506,120B IPC ... 504,506,120B IPC ????????? ?????, ???????? ???? ? ????? ??? ?? ????- 420,120B,504,506 IPC , ?????????? ???????? ????????, ??? ????????, ????? ???? ????????, ?????????? ?????, ?????? ????? ???? ?? ???? - 34,35,420,467,468,504,506,120B IPC , ? ??????? ??? ?? ???? - 504,506,120B IPC
Nagar under Section 204 Cr.P.C., whereby they have been summoned to face trial under Sections 406 , 504 and 506 I.P.C. along ... under Section 202 Cr.P.C. are even considered to be true, still ingredients of offences under Sections 406 , 504 and 506
