move-
"That in clause (2) of article 22 , the words "recognised by
the State or" be deleted."
I move this amendment ... accept amendment No. 26 to amendment No. 687 by
Pandit Thakur Dass Bhargava. I am also prepared to
accept amendment No. 31 to amendment
them before this Court and which were pending, the petitioners have moved an amendment in the respective writ petitions stating that the impugned part ... said to be irreproachable. As a matter of fact, the amendment moved by the petitioners cannot be considered by this Court while granting relief
General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Amendment Bill, 2001 Moved By ... on 9 May, 2002
15.15 hrs
Title: The General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Amendment Bill, 2001 moved ... Item No.12 – further consideration of the General insurance Business (Nationalisation) Amendment Bill.
Shri Rupchand Pal, the time allotted to your party was 11 minutes
Companies (Amendment) Bill, 2001. (Bill Passed) on 10 December, 2002
NT>
14.22 hrs
Title: Discussion on the Companies (Amendment) Bill, 2001. (Bill passed) (Bill ... COMPANY AFFAIRS (SHRI JASWANT SINGH): Mr. Deputy-Speaker, Sir, I beg to move:*
"That the Bill further to amend the Companies
Further Consideration And Passing Of The Insurance (Amendment) Bill, 2001 Moved ... on 15 May, 2002
14.30 hrs.
Title: Further consideration and passing of the Insurance ... Amendment) Bill, 2001 moved by Balasaheb Vikhe Patil on 13th May, 2002 (Bill passed).
MR. CHAIRMAN : The House will now take up Legislative Business, item
Further Discussion On The Insurance (Amendment) Bill, 2001 Moved By Shri ... on 14 May, 2002
१८.३९ hrs.
Title: Further discussion on the Insurance (Amendment
referred back to the Advisory Committee for reconsideration. Ultimately,
the amendment moved by Shri K.M. Munshi was adopted and sub-clause (2)
of Clause ... amendment."
It is at that stage, Shri Thakur Dass Bhargava moved amendment No.
26 to amendment No. 687. According to him, for amendment
abovesaid rule appears to have been completely over-looked
while moving the application for amendment. It is expected that the
Courts in Punjab, Haryana ... pleading the same.
In the case before us the application for amendment moved by
the occupants did not satisfy the abovesaid requirements. Again we
have
Katju and Rakesh Tiwari, JJ.
1. The petitioner is permitted to move amendment application to challenge the notification of the Central Government dated 22.2.2002, Annexure
placed or coming before it".
Further, Prof KT Shah also moved amendment No. 1483, which provided for
insertion of Clause (3) after Article ... remove the said absurdity, the First Amendment Bill for amendment of
Articles 85 and 174 was moved. While introducing the First Amendment Bill,
Pt. Jawahar
