DEPUTY
COMMISSIONER BOTH ON 4.8.10, RESPECTIVELY MARKED
AS ANN-E & SET ASIDE THE SAME AS ILLEGAL, ARBITRARY &
DEVIOD OF MERITS ... LEARNED SPECIAL DEPUTY
COMMISSIONER, ON 25.3.11 MARKED AS ANN-C THE SAME
AS ILLEGAL, ARBITRARY & DEVOID OF MERITS ETC.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS HAVING BEEN
ORDER DATED 28.05.2018 AND ORDER
DATED 30.05.2018 MARKED AS ANNEXURE-D AND E AS
ARBITRARY, ILLEGAL, UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND
VIOLATIVE OF ARTICLES
Committee could assign 10 marks for
"Outstanding", 8 marks for "Very Good" and 6
marks for "Good" grading ... viva voce, the selection process can
be considered to be arbitrary. The spread of marks in the
viva voce test being enormously large compared
that there is discrepancy in awarding of
marks or variance in awarding of marks and that it is
not identical or similar in nature ... absence of
there being non application of mind or arbitrary manner
of awarding marks in the sense that the marks awarded
are not similar
consideration. Written
Test carried 70 marks, Interview carried 20 marks,
Performance appraisal reports carried 10 marks, in total
100 marks to become eligible for consideration ... there cannot be any scope for arbitrariness
in the selection. The appellant did not secure minimum
marks and hence he could not be selected
COURT
AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE-L ISSUED BY THE SECOND
RESPONDENT AS THE SAME IS ILLEGAL, ARBITRARY,
CAPRICIOUS AND PASSED WITHOUT APPLICATION OF MIND.
THIS ... Court and marked as Annexure-L
issued by the Second Respondent as the same
is illegal, arbitrary, capricious and passed
without application of mind
order, which is
produced and marked as annexure-L as the same is illegal,
arbitrary, capricious and passed without application of mind and
etc.
These
DATED 08.02.2017
COPY PRODUCED AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE-L AS
ILLEGAL, ARBITRARY, AND VIOLATIVE OF ARTICLE 14 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
THIS WRIT PETITION
PASSED BY THE R-5, WHICH IS PRODUCED AND MARKED AS
ANNEXURE-E AS ILLEGAL, ARBITRARY, CAPRICIOUS AND
PASSED WITHOUT APPLICATION OF MIND.
THIS PETITION ... conducted on
23.11.2017 and as per the said report, there is no
marked variation with regard to the adulteration as
contended presently and therefore
KIND
PERUSAL OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND MARKED AS
ANNEXURE-K IS ILLEGAL, ARBITRARY, DISCRIMINATORY AND
OPPOSE TO THE PRINCIPALES OF NATURAL JUSTICE
