other hand, the petitioner is allotted one mark. The first
selected candidate namely Jaiprakash is allotted two marks.
In that context, Sri Ramesh, learned counsel ... allotted two marks. Therefore, we find that respondent
No.1 has not proceeded to allot marks in arbitrary manner.
On the other hand, the performance
clear
that the requirement of obtaining minimum percentage of
marks at 45% of the total marks in the case of general
category in the qualifying ... admission in the respondent No.4-
College, the marks card produced and the total percentage of
marks obtained by him, as fairly submitted
from the acquisition
proceedings. He submits that the casualness and arbitrariness are
to be marked about the conduct of the authorities in the acquisition
cases
DATED 1.3.2011 IN APPEAL NO.22/2010 MARKED AT ANNEXURE-
M, AND ALSO THE MEMO DATED 18.5.2011 MARKED AT
ANNEXURE-N, ISSUED ... 2010 dated
18.05.2011 marked at Annexure-N issued
by the 1st respondent, as the same are
illegal, unjust, arbitrary, malafide and
accordingly liable
ORIGINAL COPY OF WHICH IS PRODUCED & MARKED AS
ANNEXURE - L SINCE THE SAME IS ARBITRARY & TOTALLY
CONTRARY TO THE SCHEME OF THE INDUSTRIAL
valuation only if there is a
difference of 15% marks between the two re-valuers and
taking away the chance which was afforded ... valuation, there should be a
difference of 15 marks, which is arbitrary as there is a
possibility that a candidate would get good marks
arbitrary, irrational and illegal and is also in
violation of the principles of natural justice. Further,
she wanted a declaration that the scaled / moderated
marks ... grievance was that the process of moderation of
marks, being outside the jurisdiction of UPSC., was
arbitrary, irrational and illegal. Therefore, she
approached the Tribunal
valuation only if there is a
difference of 15% marks between the two re-valuers and
taking away the chance which was afforded ... valuation, there should be a
difference of 15 marks, which is arbitrary as there is a
possibility that a candidate would get good marks
valuation only if there is a
difference of 15% marks between the two re-valuers and
taking away the chance which was afforded ... valuation, there should be a
difference of 15 marks, which is arbitrary as there is a
possibility that a candidate would get good marks
management. Upon hearing on memo,
the documents produced by the management were marked
as Exs.M1 to M27. Considering an application filed ... from service passed against the
petitioner is arbitrary and illegal?
6. Exs.M1 to M27 were marked by consent before
the Labour Court
