brief, is that the defendants are the legal representatives of one B.Ramaiah, who died on 18.10.1994 and the plaintiff and the deceased B ... transaction, a settlement was reached on 20.01.1994 between the plaintiff and B.Ramaiah, in the presence of Panchayatdars and the terms of the settlement
B.Ramaiah vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 28 November, 2018
Author: K.Ravichandrabaabu
Bench: K.Ravichandrabaabu
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ... B.Ramaiah
Represented by his Power of Attorney Agent
Sasikala ..Petitioner in W.P.No.16040 of 2017
2.Malliga
Represented by her Power
B.Ramaiah vs The Registrar General on 3 November, 2023
Author: S.M.Subramaniam
Bench: S.M.Subramaniam
W.P.(MD)No.14180 ... JUSTICE R. KALAIMATHI
W.P.(MD)No.14180 of 2023
B.Ramaiah ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Registrar General,
High Court of Madras,
Chennai
Meenakshi vs B.Ramaiah on 19 October, 2016
Author: Pushpa Sathyanarayana
Bench: Pushpa Sathyanarayana
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED ... Meenakshi .. Appellant
-Vs.-
B.Ramaiah .. Respondent
Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the judgment and decree dated 21.06.2004 passed by the learned I Additional Principal Judge
Ramaiah vs B.Venkatasamy on 17 July, 2023
C.M.A.No.2498 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED ... Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No.2498 of 2018
1. Ramaiah
2. Maheswari ... Appellants/Petitioners
Vs.
1. B.Venkatasamy
[No relief sought against the 1st respondent
Sampangi Ramaiah vs Smt. B.K.Meena Irs on 14 July, 2022
Author: S.Vaidyanathan
Bench: S.Vaidyanathan , Krishnan Ramasamy
Cont ... RAMASAMY
Contempt Petition No.1740 of 2019
V.Sampangi Ramaiah ... Petitioner
...Vs...
1.Smt. B.K.Meena IRS,
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax,
Gandhi
belonged to a
certain Sathan. Sathan had three children viz., (a) Ramaiah (b)
Kanniah; and (c) Kunjammal. After the demise of Sathan, his
___________
Page ... fell to the share of Kanniah.
b) While so, on 12.02.1976, vide Ext.A.1 = Ext.B.1, Kanniah created a
usufructuary mortgage
belonged to a
certain Sathan. Sathan had three children viz., (a) Ramaiah (b)
Kanniah; and (c) Kunjammal. After the demise of Sathan, his
___________
Page ... fell to the share of Kanniah.
b) While so, on 12.02.1976, vide Ext.A.1 = Ext.B.1, Kanniah created a
usufructuary mortgage
amount of Rs.5,000/- given to him by Sri.B.Sundar Ramaiah for crediting the same ... B.Sundar Ramaiah and reimbursed the amount fraudulently credited to depositor's SB A/c on 23.12.1985 by way of aforesaid fictitious / false
acres under Ext.B1 sale deed, dated 03.05.1947. The western
boundary of the property covered under Ext.B1 was shown ... three sons namely
(a) Kuppamuthu Servai, the defendant herein, (b) Ramaiah Servai,
and (c) Lakshmanan Servai. On 09.04.1974, all the three brothers
had jointly
