units, then re-
grouping of the vends was permissible.
6. For District Bathinda, the entire area was divided into 20
groups. The draw of lots ... interest of revenue and recommended for formation of
three groups for entire Bathinda District. The same was accepted by the
Commissioner on the same
Financers, Bathinda vs Narinder Jeet Kaur And Ors on 8 February, 2016
Author: Surinder Gupta
Bench: Surinder Gupta ... Date of Decision : 08.02.2016
SBS Financers Bathinda ....Appellant
Versus
Narinder Jeet Kaur and others ....Respondents
2. FAO No. 3174 of 2011 (O&M)
Narinder
Judgment and decree dated 26.02.2015 passed by learned
Additional District Judge, Bathinda, vide which the appeal filed by the
appellants against the judgment and decree ... dated 26.11.2013 passed by
learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bathinda, has been dismissed.
2. Plaintiff-respondent No.1 filed the suit for recovery
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bathinda vs Charanjit Singh Sandhu on 29 January, 2016
Bench: Kurian Joseph , Rohinton Fali Nariman
1
ITEM NO.20+50 COURT ... High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At
Chandigarh)
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BATHINDA AND ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
CHARANJIT SINGH SANDHU Respondent(s)
(with appln
Civil Lines, Bathinda vs Sonu Verma Prop. M/S Shiva Jewllerys. ... on 16 February, 2016
Author: Ajay Kumar Mittal
Bench: Ajay Kumar Mittal ... Decided on : 16.02.2016.
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Civil Lines, Bathinda
. . . Appellant
Versus
Sonu Verma Prop. M/s Shiva Jewellers
. . . Respondent
CORAM
Commissioner Of Income Tax Bathinda vs Chiranji Lal Garg on 24 October, 2016
Bench: Kurian Joseph , Rohinton Fali Nariman
ITEM NO.23 COURT ... High Court of Punjab & Haryana at
Chandigarh)
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX BATHINDA & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
CHIRANJI LAL GARG Respondent(s)
(with appln
Durga Parshad vs Shree Sanatan Dharam Sabha Bathinda on 29 March, 2016
Author: Rameshwar Singh Malik
Bench: Rameshwar Singh Malik
IN THE HIGH COURT
Shree Sanatan Dharam Sabha Bathinda on 29 March, 2016
Author: Rameshwar Singh Malik
Bench: Rameshwar Singh Malik
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Kissan Fats Ltd., Bathinda vs Dcit, Ludhiana on 5 December, 2016
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
DIVISION BENCH, CHANDIGARH
BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL ... Hazi Rattan Link Road, Central Circle-I,
Bathinda. Ludhiana.
PAN: AAHFG2637C
(Appellant) (Respondent)
Appellant by : Shri Sudhir Sehgal
Respondent by : Shri Manjit Singh, DR
Date
Parminderjeet Singh vs Improvement Trust, Bathinda on 26 April, 2016
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION NEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 806 OF 2016 (Against ... SUKHNA ABLU, DISTRICT-MUKATSAR SAHIB PUNJAB ...........Petitioner(s) Versus 1. IMPROVEMENT TRUST, BATHINDA BATHINDA, THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN/ADMINISTRATOR/EXECUTIVE OFFICER, BATHINDA PUNJAB ...........Respondent(s)
BEFORE
