exeer': ::;§~:*:éef».!_ e';',j'
2. Thie eeestéen had Cesee_VeA»e_e
before this Cour': in the ease
zeeervze
Maharashtra State Electricity ... vs Shri Vikram Sunderdas Setiya & Ors on 7 September, 2011
Judgment
r1toti<oeV"'ttie eeéeivsion of the Caicutta High Court
cese «oVtm§9v!Al\&AGER, um BANK v. SAMAR
Sri D Sudhakar vs Sri D N Jeevaraju on 14 February, 2011
Equivalent citations: AIR
deposit of a sum of Rs.40.000/- by the petitioner with CESE Limited in addition
to deposit of 50% of the amount covered
also promotions. The appeal w was accordingly
disposed of. |
7: The cese un hand is identical. The respondent is
unable to perforta the duty
cEse
obtained
the same_a """ "~IhT the <cese= referred to, the ganohw
witness never steted that the accused demanded any
amount
entitled to additionai beeefits in terms of
the decisien in fineg Singhe cese eiie then answer as to
3'
293
X', ,
10
whether
submits that the appeal
may be disrriseect.
4, The proceeding i thts cese commenced with,
the fling of a petition belore sh: karipura