applicant. He submits that he has already submitted necessary certificates under FR 53(1) and 53(2) stating clearly that he was not working anywhere ... applicant was allowed to draw subsistence allowance admissible under FR 53 (1) read with FR 53(2), and in the order dated 6th August
mandamus commanding the respondents to comply with the provisions of FR 53 by passing appropriate order in the matter in increase the subsistence allowance from ... dated 28.3.2011 has not applied his mind to the provisions of FR 53 (i) (ii) (a). In terms of provisions of said Rule
appellate order. Although Mr. Sharma has submitted that under FR 53 the period has to be treated as service for all purposes, including
suspension, he was paid subsistence allowance and Dearness Allowance under FR 53 (1). The 1st respondent also issued another G.O.(3D) No.77, dated
Note 3 to Rule 7 of the Revised Pay Rules and FR 53(1)(ii)(a) with the clarification with Office Memorandum dated
53 'fr'E;5'xRS
E%.ESII}§NG 95'1"'
KEELKU
with..jIzt€.2*é$t' *E'S%..«}3.aa. fr<53.':%_ ihs: daiie {if
ptét
cases under FR 54-A and FR 54-B where no
provision like sub-rule (7) in FR 54 is available. Therefore, the
order ... 2928 of 2011 12
FR 53-B is also erroneous, the proper rule that is applicable is
FR 54. The above aspect is also clarified
Ranger will be paid subsistence allowance and dearness allowance admissible under FR 53(1).
The headquarters of the said Thiru M.Raman, Ranger, during
consider the case of the petitioner in the light of FR 53(1). The petitioner had also filed a contempt petition being Contempt Petition ... entitled for enhancement of subsistence allowance. But, however, a perusal of FR 53 clearly shows that it is not an absolute right of the petitioner
