Plaintiffs-respondents pleaded that they are
recorded as "Gair Maurusi Tenant" over the suit land as per
latest Jamabandi, but they have become ... their plaint specifically averred that they are
recorded as "Gair Maurusi Tenant" over the suit land as per
latest Jamabandi and they
Plaintiffs-respondents pleaded that they are
recorded as "Gair Maurusi Tenant" over the suit land as per
latest Jamabandi, but they have become ... their plaint specifically averred that they are
recorded as "Gair Maurusi Tenant" over the suit land as per
latest Jamabandi and they
plaintiff entered into his shoes and was
reflected/shown as "Gair Maurusi" on payment of rent in
revenue record. With a view ... plaintiff, plaintiff is in possession of the suit
land as "Gair Maurusi" on payment of rent, and as such,
judgment passed
tenant and
did not enjoy the status of a " Gair Maurusi" tenant.
The Company entered into a contract of lease with the
Gwalior ... accordance with paras 5 &
6 of the Plaint was a `gair Maurusi tenant' and now
by virtue of the Revenue Administration and
Ryotwari
father inducting respondent
No.3, Chattar Singh, as a "gair maurusi" upon the suit
land, whereupon, it recorded a conclusive finding qua
respondent ... holding the status of a "gair maurusi"
upon the acquired land, whereupon it stood constrained
to render a further finding qua the aforesaid
share. The defendants'
predecessors were allegedly recorded as gair maurusi tenants on 1/3 batai
under Parma Lal, and this arrangement con nued with ... recorded as Gair Maurusians. The conten on
of learned senior counsel for the defendants-appellants is that the words
"Gair Maurusi through Parma
Ryot
Pattedar", "Mamuli Maurusi", "Gair Maurusi" and
"Pukhta Maurusi" when this Act comes into force ... case of a sub-tenant An amount equal to the
of Gair Maurusi tenant. double of the net annual
income of that land
entries appearing in the
revenue record showing the plaintiff to be Gair Maurusi
instead of owner and also the entries appearing in the
::: Downloaded ... name of the defendants qua the suit land showing him
Gair Maurusi over the portion of the suit land are wrong,
void ab initio, illegal
been upheld even up to this Court in the capacity of Gair Maurusi
tenant without payment of any rent and therefore, he could ... defendant of present case was upheld in the capacity of Gair Maurusi
tenant.
3.4 With these submissions, he prayed for seJng aside the
judgment
suit land as Dholidars and on some
parts as gair-maurusi. In the rent column, their possession was recorded as
gair-maurusi, with no rent ... land was shown in possession of the defendants as gair-
maurusi, the defendants never claimed tenancy rights. Their possession,
therefore, was rightly presumed
