being (li.'r3f,ll1'b('('l. and the Act ("l('){.'51-SVl"1'('_)l
provide ... sturbed 'i:gi1applicat.i0n under section 34 of the Act even
that t1'1e evidence placed
gi;««..:,)"'{' -'--f':j__f1'<:: Act
Contract Act are not thatthe
bank had not gi'Jenr_ :. i had been
offered by the had chosen to
enforce which could fetch
bette ... buiit up on the premise that
§_%ections 134 of the Contract Act disentitie the
' Vioifirst-.respoVnd_ent recovery ofiicer to put the property
gi=n.a_1,a3ka
High Court Act , against the Order f2'i.1V(2);2Q_R()9': passed
act, is a
.. ,:sg:.fm';':£s$:§as:<1 which flees mat merit acceptance
". 'f<§::' the reasail that flag ... act in the sense
0%' fa%;ie.1;";€.nVg zéishéng the Gflier,
hviiigcfiminatcry act, :15 it 2:3
tiéfgfialfléfstfatedy wcatfld I}GI
GI? KARNATAKA HEGH
CQURT ACT,' ?R§ZYh\T§}.__Tif} SEDE1 THE ORDER 15/G2/2008
MADE
Mahesh Wodeyar, learned
AGA, that Section Gi. cof the Karnat: aKa Excise Act, 1965,
providing for-arr anpe:
for th © spentions: S|
cismissed ~ Wi vithout
nding that this case is not
Section 9 {I}[vi) of the Act.
18. Sri. Seshachala would co1}t.ehci"._ihe1t ... c1e1"in1'1.i--:)I1 f V. 1'gi
statutory
provisions of section 1941A of the Act.
6. Section 194LA of the Income Tax Act, 1961,__1__'eads as
under ... gi, wP11295.o6
other than the immovable property for the purpose of
section 1941A of the Act and therefore there is no
obligation
Qperation. of 2'? of 1:.h<--: EDA Act
which years from fhe date ... fqEli8i'€,§.GI} ;3sr<;<?:eedi:}g$ whisk bezgam way
'€'}'i€i% §,i"¢:%a.I' E988 aim} whiiii
