Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

njn9:itr§;ae.nt with the customers and theretete', ee'htet§;Eed that the Eiaistfa effice in as a permanent estabA3

piacéng reliance on the record'emh'e'«::<:«htet:rJ:é«._thVatV«' the presectstioe has not been abie

after the accident étgaiiisi him. This is a suit filed:v'htet l"01'«'theVfl:injuries sustained. T he plaintiff

Petiti0ne1's be relealseni on bail on eachCf'htet-mV'e'xeeLi't.Efig "ar_pe1*s0nal bond

bmther hf th'é>{:_§vv"h_er $7?'-€:hTet'V%:eh§§<:§e and she of his friend beamed

Ortieit dated 20.2.1991 and she has been ' ehtttjalv4'"htet'e'nients regularly and she was app0intedVV'12Q ti:)u1V5t

filed W.P.No.19988/2009 ii't_t+ohj':hteT this ivofirthis court. In this W.P.No.19988/2009 the respondentfreifeiiue

ggatjod logs were being transported. came in an ovewspeeding V:E'htet't;ét3ted and was feund that it contasried taetitioner left

Private Complaint of the .J.M.F.C. 11 ~ Cotuft, Hub1t_t§§.htet§"» for default by is seen that despite the? to secure