vide order dated 18,3.1998 in view of his finding that the Mohitmim had no right to create lease for a period of 99 years ... satisfied, plaintiffs have come in further appeal to this Court.
6. Mohitmim of che smadh could not lease out the property of smadh
Devi Dawar Temple Through Mohitmim Beba vs Union Of India (Uoi) on 5 October, 1993
Equivalent citations: (1993)105PLR683
JUDGMENT
N.K. Sodhi
obstructions and restrictions in the performance of
the religious duties by the Mohitmim of the Tirth
Jyotisar, Idols of the temples situated at the Tirth ... Jyotisar, Samadhies etc. situated at the Tirth Jyotisar
which the mohitmim is performing since the long time as
mentioned in the plaint;
(iv) That
gift was accepted by Gujjar Singh being the Mohitmim of the
Gurudwara Sahib. The said Gulab Kaur also made a Will on
01.06.1964, regarding ... Singh, took forcible possession of the land from said Gujjar
Singh, the Mohitmim. Gujjar Singh filed a civil suit for possession of
the land through
suit property belonged to the Dera. Originally,
Mahant Charan Dass was the Mohitmim of the Dera, who died on
1 of 5
::: Downloaded ... Civil Procedure. On
merits, it was submitted that the appointment of Mohitmim was governed by
Shahi Pharman dated 21.04.1921. The plaintiff had already applied
Mohitmim Arjun Muni vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 20 September, 2016
Author: A.B. Chaudhari
Bench: A.B. Chaudhari ... Date of decision: September 20, 2016
Mohitmim Arjun Muni Chela Gurmukh Dass
......Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
.....Respondents
CORAM
Mahant @Mohitmim Sadhu Ram And Anr vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 6 April, 2021
Author: Alka Sarin
Bench: Alka Sarin ... CHANDIGARH
CWP-7612-2021 (O&M)
Date of decision : 06.04.2021
Mahant @ Mohitmim Sadhu Ram and another
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Punjab and others
further pleaded by the plaintif that Mahant
Hari Dass was the Mohitmim of Mandir Thakur Dwara who looked
after the management of property including ... defendant and specifically pleaded that Mahant
Hari Dass is not Mohitmim of plaintif and, as such, has no right
to file the present suit
this second appeal are
to the effect that plaintiff through its Mohitmim Krishan Nath filed a suit
for possession by way of ejectment against ... property in
dispute. It was denied that Krishan Nath is the Mohitmim of the Mandir.
Further it was averred that defendant
died on
11.5.1986. The aforementioned Dharamshala Salaudi was left
without any Mahant/Mohitmim. The application was submitted
by the appellant on 4.7.1988 for his appointment ... village Salaudi
for the purpose of appointment of the appellant as Mohitmim is
weak piece of evidence. He further submitted that there is no
written