Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 35 (0.36 seconds)

Soundarajan vs State Represented By on 28 March, 2018

counsel appearing for the petitioners further submitted that condemning the road between Peikulam and Pannamparai Vilakku did not lay properly, the petitioners genuinely decided ... Kamarajar Statue and made a demonstration, demanding to lay a road, between Peikulam and Pannamparai Vilakku properly, preventing the buses and thereby, caused disturbance
Madras High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - M S Ramesh - Full Document

Manikandan vs State Represented By on 28 March, 2018

counsel appearing for the petitioners further submitted that condemning the road between Peikulam and Pannamparai Vilakku did not lay properly, the petitioners genuinely decided ... Kamarajar Statue and made a demonstration, demanding to lay a road, between Peikulam and Pannamparai Vilakku properly, preventing the buses and thereby, caused disturbance
Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - M S Ramesh - Full Document

S.Aranmanaisamy vs The Tahsildar on 4 July, 2025

Tahsildar, Tahsildar Office, Kadaladi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. 2. The Firka Surveyor, Peikulam Village, Kadaladi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article ... extent of 20.19 ares, in Peikulam Village, Kadaladi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District and mark boundaries on the basis of the application dated 21.04.2025 made
Madras High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next