praying for restoration of the main
case (ROR No.379 of 2019-20) which was dismissed in default; has been
dismissed.
2. Briefly, the petitioners ... seeking restoration of the main case (ROR No.379 of
2019-20), however the said application was also dismissed in default vide
order dated
praying for restoration of the main case (ROR No.380 of
2019-20) which was dismissed in default; has been dismissed.
2. Briefly, the petitioner ... seeking restoration of the main case (ROR No.380
2024.09.11 16:06
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document/judgment
High Court
inter alia, that a
compromise was effected between the parties in case ROR
No.148 of 2004, titled as Manjit Kaur v. Rani and others
dated 19.04.2023
(Annexure P-8) passed by respondent No.2 in case ROR No.32 of 2022
titled as Prompt Engineering Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner ... aside the instrument
of partition dated 23.01.2017 (Annexure P-2) passed in case No.215/
Tehsil/08 of village Begampur Khatola titled
Appeals), Punjab, whereby above-said ROR-205-2019 has been dismissed
in default.
2. Briefly the main revision petition (ROR-205-2019) filed by
petitioners ... petitioners to move a fresh application seeking restoration of
main case (ROR-205-2019), which was dismissed in default on 23.04.2024
(Annexure P-3) after
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in
the present case ROR-73-2022 was filed by the petitioner before the
Financial Commissioner, Haryana ... that the
ROR is also now fixed for 09.02.2023 before Financial Commissioner
(Revenue), Haryana. It is submitted that in the present case the
service
Commissioner to deal with the matters with regard to sanad takseem,
ROR is not being entertained.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners ... litigation and on instructions from his office, submitted
that in case, ROR is filed in respect of the matters initiated prior to
notification dated
litigation and on instructions from his office, submitted that
in case, ROR is filed in respect of the matters initiated prior to notification
dated ... liberty to the
petitioner to file the ROR in view of the aforementioned observations and in
case, such revision along with interim application is filed
ROR is not being entertained.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
has challenged the order of the Collector by filing the ROR ... litigation and on instructions from his office, submitted
that in case, ROR is filed in respect of the matters initiated prior to
notification dated
takseem,
ROR is not being entertained.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
has challenged the order by filing the ROR before ... litigation and on instructions from his office, submitted
that in case, ROR is filed in respect of the matters initiated prior to
notification dated
