heading to?
In this Bill, Mr. Deputy Speaker Sir, nowhere the word ‘refugee’ has been used; nowhere, the word, ‘infiltrator’ has been used; nowhere ... have a refugee policy. We are not signatory to that policy as per the UN Refugee Convention. India recognises migrants, not refugees. India recognises illegal
party to the 1951 Convention nor the 1967 Protocol, both relating to the status of
refugees. However, even in the 1967 Protocol, Article 2 very
different. The
policy of the Government of India is that Tamil Refugees/migrants
who had entered into India after 1983 and posses a valid travel ... under Section 5(1)(c) of
the Indian Citizenship Act, 1955. Other refugees/migrants who do
not have valid passport/VISA/residential permit are treated
state here that India was not a
party to the 1951 Convention nor the 1967 Protocol, both relating to the status ... judis.nic.in
H.C.P. No.2399 of 2020
refugees. However, even in the 1967 Protocol, Article 2 very clearly states as
under
state here that India was not a
party to the 1951 Convention nor the 1967 Protocol, both relating to the status ... judis.nic.in
H.C.P. No.1625 of 2020
refugees. However, even in the 1967 Protocol, Article 2 very clearly states as
under
refugee and international humanitarian law”
HON CHAIRMAN: Please avoid quotations.
DR. D. RAVIKUMAR : This amendment Bill is totally against the international laws and the conventions
Anant Narayan Mishra vs The Union Of India And 4 Others on 2 December, 2019
Satyam Rai vs Banaras Hindu University And 5 Others on 2 December, 2019
Author: Ajay
Shahbaz Ali Khan vs Union Of India And 3 Others on 2 December, 2019
Author
The Conservation Action Trust And 2 Ors vs Union Of India And 3 Ors on
