Robkar vs Vishal Anand on 31 December, 2018
Author: Sanjay Kumar Gupta
Bench: Sanjay Kumar Gupta
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
ROBCR ... 2017
c/w
ROBCR No. 05/2018
Date of order: 31.12.2018
Robkar Vs. Vishal Anand
Coram:
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Gupta, Judge
legal
obligation to implement the judgment. It is also submitted that a Robkar
should be framed against the respondents.
6. Mr. Abhinav Sharma, learned counsel ... willful disobedience of the
order passed by this Court including framing of Robkar against them. The
presence of Secretary, Department of Law, Justice and Parliamentary
willful
disobedience of the order passed by this Court including
framing of Robkar against them. The presence of Secretary,
Department of Law, Justice and Parliamentary
former and
ultimately after hearing him passed appropriate order in the robkar
against him. The petitioner could not have been in law compelled ... incarceration to deposit the amount on the bail bond in the
robkar against the surety, nor could he be forced to deposit any amount
former and
ultimately after hearing him passed appropriate order in the robkar
against him. The petitioner could not have been in law compelled ... incarceration to deposit the amount on the bail bond in the
robkar against the surety, nor could he be forced to deposit any amount
former and
ultimately after hearing him passed appropriate order in the robkar
against him. The petitioner could not have been in law compelled ... incarceration to deposit the amount on the bail bond in the
robkar against the surety, nor could he be forced to deposit any amount
initiating contempt.
Before proceedings further in the matter and issuing a formal ROBKAR
against the respondents, I deem it proper to provide one more opportunity
respondents are, therefore, prima-
facie in Contempt. However, before I frame the Robkar
and call upon the respondents to show cause as to why
they
respondents are, therefore, prima facie
in Contempt. However, before I frame the Robkar and call upon the
respondents to show cause as to why they
filed by the
respondents nor has anybody present on their behalf. Therefore, robkar be
framed against the respondents.
Let contempt notice be issued against
