needs to exercise its power under section 258 Cr.P.C
qua offences u/s 279 / 304-A IPC ... have speedy justice invokes the power conferred upon it
under s.258 of Cr.P.C to stop the proceedings against accused Mohd.
Khushbuddin Ansari
court needs to exercise its power under section 258 Cr.P.C qua offences u/s
279 / 338 IPC to make the ends of justice ... have speedy justice invokes the power conferred upon it under
s.258 of Cr.P.C to stop the proceedings against accused Sandeep qua offences
needs to exercise its power under section 258
Cr.P.C qua offences u/s 287 / 304-A IPC to make the ends of justice ... have speedy justice invokes the
power conferred upon it under s.258 of Cr.P.C to stop the proceedings against
accused Akash Juneja
Addl Cit Large Tax Payer Unit, Mumbai vs Reliance Industries Ltd, Mumbai on 12 April
Irfan vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 9 September, 2021
Author: Vivek Rusia
Bench
Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., New Delhi vs Addl. Cit, New Delhi on 17 October, 2018
Peary Mohan Das vs D. Weston And Ors. on 7 August, 1911
Equivalent citations: 13IND
accused before the
Trial Court has filed an application u/s.258 of Cr.P.C.
seeking stopping of the further proceedings on the
ground
Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail.
The applicant apprehend his arrest in connection with Crime
No.258/2014 registered at P.S. Lordganj ... accused persons filed an application under Section 438
of the Cr.P.C. before the trial Court. During pendency of that
application Police filed first
Salman Salim Khan vs The State Of Maharashtra on 10 December, 2015
Author: A.R
