judiciary is not state for the purpose of Article 12. In A.R.Antulay v. R.S.Nayak and N.S.Mirajkar v. State ... High courts and the Supreme court. It has been given a wider meaning which ensures that Part-III of the constitution can be applied
R 577
Author: Sabyasachi Mukharji
Bench: Sabyasachi Mukharji , Misra Rangnath , G.L. Oza , B.C. Ray
PETITIONER:
A.R. ANTULAY
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
R.S. NAYAK ... under the Act of
1952. [70C,73D-E]
R.S. Nayak v. A.R. Antulay, [1984] 2 SCR 495; A.R.
Antulay v. Ramdas Sriniwas
judiciary is not state for the purpose of Article 12. In A.R.Antulay v. R.S.Nayak and N.S.Mirajkar v. State ... High courts and the Supreme court. It has been given a wider meaning which ensures that Part-III of the constitution can be applied
these circumstances, that a
Bench of seven learned Judges should consider
whether the dictum afore-mentioned in A.R.
Antulay's case still holds ... Abdul Rehman Antulay and Ors. Vs. R.S.
Nayan and Ors. (1992) 1 SCC 225, (A.R. Antulay, for short). The
proponents of right
R.S. Nayak vs A.R. Antulay & Anr on 17 April, 1986
Equivalent citations: 1986 AIR 2045, 1986 SCR (2) 621, AIR 1986 SUPREME ... Bhagwati
Bench: P.N. Bhagwati , Misra Rangnath
PETITIONER:
R.S. NAYAK
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
A.R. ANTULAY & ANR.
DATE OF JUDGMENT17/04/1986
BENCH
A. R. Antulay vs Ramdas Sriniwas Nayak And Another on 16 February, 1984
Equivalent citations: 1984 AIR 718, 1984 SCR (2) 914, AIR 1984 SUPREME ... A. Desai
Bench: D.A. Desai , R.S. Pathak , O. Chinnappa Reddy , A.P. Sen , V. Balakrishna Eradi
PETITIONER:
A. R. ANTULAY
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
RAMDAS
R. S. Nayak vs A. R. Antulay on 16 February, 1984
Equivalent citations: 1984 AIR 684, 1984 SCR (2) 495, AIR 1984 SUPREME COURT ... A. Desai , R.S. Pathak , O. Chinnappa Reddy , A.P. Sen , V. Balakrishna Eradi
PETITIONER:
R. S. NAYAK
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
A. R. ANTULAY
DATE
this proposition on the
judgment of a Constitution Bench of this Court in the case of A.R.
Antulay v. R.S. Nayak ... Amendment Act, 1952 to the High
Court. (See R.S. Nayak v. A.R. Antulay , (1984) 2 SCC 183). This Court
answered the question
also the relied on judgment in RS
Nayak v. A R. Antulay [1984 (2) SCC 183] were not correct and required
reconsideration and urged ... Nayak
v. A R. Antulay (cited supra), came to the conclusion that Shri Antulay who was
a Member of the Legislative Assembly, was not a
A.R. Antulay vs R.S. Naik & Ors on 29 October, 1986
Equivalent citations: 1987 AIR 1140, 1987 SCR (1) 91, (1986) 2 APLJ ... operative part of the judgment of this Court ( R. S.
Nayak v. A.R. Antulay , [1984] S.C.R. 495) is found at page
