Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 72 (0.87 seconds)

WPSS/792/2024 on 19 March, 2026

State of Uttarakhand. 3. Petitioner retired from the post of District Audit Officer on 31.03.2018. He filed this writ petition in the month ... effective date of Uttarakhand Audit Structure and Grade Pay Rs. 5400 from the date of promotion of the employees those were junior to the petitioner
Uttarakhand High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - M K Tiwari - Full Document

WPSS/588/2019 on 19 March, 2019

parties. According to the petitioner, he was appointed as Assistant Audit Officer in Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan against the post which was created by Government Order ... petitioner submits that the post of Assistant Audit Officer is created in the revised integrated structure. Petitioner is aggrieved by the marching orders issued
Uttarakhand High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - M K Tiwari - Full Document

Lalit Chandra Tiwari And Others ... vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others on 12 February, 2025

Principal Secretary, Forest and Environment, Government of Uttarakhand, by which the special audit report was forwarded. Two discrepancies were indicated in the said letter, namely ... second and third ACP has wrongly been given because on 05.06.2007, the structure of the Uttarakhand Forest Development Corporation ("the Forest Corporation
Uttarakhand High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - R Maithani - Full Document

Lalit Chandra Tiwari And Others ... vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others on 12 February, 2025

Principal Secretary, Forest and Environment, Government of Uttarakhand, by which the special audit report was forwarded. Two discrepancies were indicated in the said letter, namely ... second and third ACP has wrongly been given because on 05.06.2007, the structure of the Uttarakhand Forest Development Corporation ("the Forest Corporation
Uttarakhand High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - R Maithani - Full Document

Lalit Chandra Tiwari And Others ... vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others on 12 February, 2025

Principal Secretary, Forest and Environment, Government of Uttarakhand, by which the special audit report was forwarded. Two discrepancies were indicated in the said letter, namely ... second and third ACP has wrongly been given because on 05.06.2007, the structure of the Uttarakhand Forest Development Corporation ("the Forest Corporation
Uttarakhand High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - R Maithani - Full Document

Lalit Chandra Tiwari And Others ... vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others on 12 February, 2025

Principal Secretary, Forest and Environment, Government of Uttarakhand, by which the special audit report was forwarded. Two discrepancies were indicated in the said letter, namely ... second and third ACP has wrongly been given because on 05.06.2007, the structure of the Uttarakhand Forest Development Corporation ("the Forest Corporation
Uttarakhand High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - R Maithani - Full Document

Lalit Chandra Tiwari And Others ... vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others on 12 February, 2025

Principal Secretary, Forest and Environment, Government of Uttarakhand, by which the special audit report was forwarded. Two discrepancies were indicated in the said letter, namely ... second and third ACP has wrongly been given because on 05.06.2007, the structure of the Uttarakhand Forest Development Corporation ("the Forest Corporation
Uttarakhand High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - R Maithani - Full Document

Lalit Chandra Tiwari And Others ... vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others on 12 February, 2025

Principal Secretary, Forest and Environment, Government of Uttarakhand, by which the special audit report was forwarded. Two discrepancies were indicated in the said letter, namely ... second and third ACP has wrongly been given because on 05.06.2007, the structure of the Uttarakhand Forest Development Corporation ("the Forest Corporation
Uttarakhand High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - R Maithani - Full Document

Lalit Chandra Tiwari And Others ... vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others on 12 February, 2025

Principal Secretary, Forest and Environment, Government of Uttarakhand, by which the special audit report was forwarded. Two discrepancies were indicated in the said letter, namely ... second and third ACP has wrongly been given because on 05.06.2007, the structure of the Uttarakhand Forest Development Corporation ("the Forest Corporation
Uttarakhand High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - R Maithani - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next