alone. On the north of plaintiff's property, there is a vaikal poramboke. That poramboke property was annexed by the defendant ... defendant. .. .. On the north of plaintiff's property there is the vaikal poramboke. That poramboke property was annexed by the defendant
According to the respondent, on 19 July, 2008, the petitioners destroyed
the Vaikal and as such he is entitled to a decree of mandatory injunction
claims to be the Dharmakartha of Sri Selva Mariamman Koil, situate at Vaikal Thottam, Manakadavau Post, Dharapuram Taluk, Tiruppur District and the temple festival
claims that he is the Dharmakartha of Sri Muthu Marriamman temple at Vaikal Thottam, Manakadavau Post, Dharapuram Taluk, Tiruppur District and he is organising temple
initiate appropriate action preventing the 5th respondent in intermeddling with the vaikal and the adjacent foot path, cart track passing through survey
Accounts Manager,
Mr.S.Muthukumaran,
S/o A.Shanmugam,
Residing of 49A, Vaikal Road,
Pallipalayam,
Namakkal District 638 008. ..Respondent
Prayer:
Criminal Original Petition filed
third respondent from constructing any building or any superstructure over the vaikal porampoke existing adjacent to S.F.No.54-2G, Periyeripatti Village, Salem
Block No.3, Town Survey No.2/9, which was classified as Vaikal based on the proceedings of the second respondent in Na.Ka. 1630
