Tapas sought to add the present petitioner, the West Bengal Financial
Corporation (WBFC), as a party by filing an application under Order I Rule ... dispute raised by the parties in the suit, the presence of the WBFC in the suit
was not at all necessary.
7. It is relevant
petitioners
Mr. Amiya Kumar Sur
Mr. Md. Hafiz Ali ...for WBFC
Mr. Priyabrata Ghosh ...for the private respondents
Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties
sale specifically
records the fact that the Financial Institutions namely WBIDC and WBFC
16
have expressed their willingness to release the property by a letter
Aritra Basu
Mr. Abhijit Sarkar
Mr. Avik Chitta Kundu
... for the WBFC.
Two writ petitions are taken up for analogous
hearing
facto complainant
Mr. Aritra Basu .. Advocate
Mr. Abhijit Sarkar .. Advocate
... ... for the WBFC
Mr. Debajyoti Deb .. Advocate
... ... for the State
It is submitted on behalf
facto complainant
Mr. Aritra Basu .. Advocate
Mr. Abhijit Sarkar .. Advocate
... ... for the WBFC
Mr. Debajyoti Deb .. Advocate
... ... for the State
Petitioner renews his prayer
Advocate
Mr. Abhijit Sarkar .. Advocate
Mr. A. C. Kundu .. Advocate
... ... for the WBFC
Mr. Debajyoti Deb .. Advocate
... ... for the State
Let this matter appear under
4375(W) of 2015
Mr. Aritra Basu,
Mr. Abhijit Sarkar ... for the WBFC.
In the second line of the second page of the
order dated
Aritra Basu,
Mr. Abhijit Sarkar,
Mr. Abhik Chitta Kundu
.... For the WBFC.
Mr. Amitava Mitra,
Mr. Parag Chaturvedi
.... For Respondent No.4.
1. No further
petitioners
Mr. Amiya Kr. Sur,
Mr. Md. Hafiz Ali ... for the WBFC.
Let the matter appear in the supplementary list on July 15, 2019 under
