felicitously stated that a revision is not
a right but only a "procedural facility" available to a party. If
the matter is looked ... R. Antulay v. R.S.
Nayak , (1988) 2 SCC 602 : 1988 SCC (Cri) 372] . As already
noted above, the law laid down in Antulay [A
Section
309 is a partial embodiment of the requirement of speedy trial and
any delay in the trial would be a negation of the fundamental ... Constitutional Bench of the Apex Court in Abdul Rehman Antulay
Vs. R.S. Nayak and Anr. , AIR 1992 SC 1701 and Pankaj Kumar
Vs. State
Section
309 is a partial embodiment of the requirement of speedy trial and
any delay in the trial would be a negation of the fundamental ... Constitutional Bench of the Apex Court in Abdul Rehman Antulay
Vs. R.S. Nayak and Anr. , AIR 1992 SC 1701 and Pankaj Kumar
Vs. State
A.R. Antulay v. R.S. Nayak and wrongly asserted that the Supreme
Court has, "while declining a writ of certiorari at the hands ... petitioner and counsel is a complete mis-statement of the principle laid
down by the court in A.R. Antulay.
30. In view
Karambir Singh v. CBI , 2012 (1) JCC 12, A.R. Antulay & Ors. v. R.S.
Nayak & Ors, 1992 ( 1) SCC 225, Madheshwardhari Singh ... constitutional protection as enshrined
under Article 21. In the case of A.R.Antulay & Ors. (supra), the Supreme
Court propounded few propositions meant
some
cases quashing of a criminal proceeding altogether, as held by a
Constitution Bench of this Court in A.R. Antulay v. R.S. Nayak ... a case being made out of breach of
fundamental right conferred by Article 21 of the Constitution. The
Constitution Bench in A.R. Antulay case
a Government company as defined in Section 617 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956)
(57) In R.S.Nayak v. A.R.Antulay ... according to the Supreme Court in R.S. Nayak v. A.R.Antulay (supra) the corrupt conduct as delineated in the Prevention of Corruption
proceedings wherein it was held:
"9. The Constitution Bench, in A.R. Antulay case [(1992) 1
SCC 225 : 1992 SCC (Cri) 93] , heard elaborate ... discharging the
accused. In conclusion we hold:
(1) The dictum in A.R. Antulay case [(1992) 1 SCC 225 :
1992 SCC (Cri) 93] is correct
judgment of the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in A.R. Antulay v. R.S. Nayak , observed:
"While laying down the propositions ... judgment, which is as under:
(1) The dictum in A.R. Antulay 's case is correct and still holds the field.
(2) The propositions
Supreme Court as made in R.S.Naik v. A.R.Antulay , . The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the said case examined the question ... same effect are the observations in R.S.Naik v. A.R.Antulay , (1984) 3 Scc 194, and Habibullah Khan v. State of Orissa
