2019
and quash the same insofar as the reference to acupuncture therapy contained
therein is concerned.
For Petitioner : Mr.B.Murugavel ... 2019 and quash the same insofar as the reference
to acupuncture therapy contained therein is concerned.
2. The case of the petitioner is that
Satbhama Goutam Naniwadekar both residing in Nagpur, for seeking treatment by an Acupuncture Therapy as the appellant /original complainant was suffering from back pain. Respondent ... Satbhama Naniwadekar who is Acupuncture Therapy Specialist advised electro acupuncture therapy to the appellant- Mrs. Neelima. The appellant on seeking information from the Web Site
forbearing the respondents from
interfering with the day-to-day practice of Acupuncture System of
Treatment by the members of the petitioner association.
For Petitioner ... forbearing the respondents from interfering with the day-to-day
practice of Acupuncture System of Treatment by the members of the
petitioner association
004021
respondents to recognize the treatment taken by the
petitioner through acupuncture therapy as a
permissible medical therapy and allow him to take
such treatment ... petitioner
incurred on his treatment relating to his ailments
through acupuncture therapy submitted in past and to
be submitted in future, in the interest
application
submitted by the petitioner for renewal of the licence for
conducting Acupuncture clinic, stating that clarification is
required from the Director of the Health ... Indian Council of Medical Research, New
Delhi on 11.03.2019, a committee on Acupuncture has been
constituted for developing guidelines for Acupuncture as a
system
addition thereof, is duly equipped with the course of Diploma in
Acupuncture, vide certificate dated 07.04.2019 (Annexure P-11).
It is denied that the petitioner
whereas respondent No.4 possesses
qualification of MBBS, Diploma in Anesthesiology and
Acupuncture. Therefore learned counsel would submit that
respondent No.4 would not possess
Karnataka Private Medical Establishment
Rules alleging that the petitioner is practicing acupuncture without
obtaining licence under the Act. The learned Magistrate, after
accepting the charge
Writ of Mandamus, permitting the petitioners to register
their practice in Acupuncture with the 3rd respondent as per the order in Ref.
No.R.14015
Raviraj Sadhuprasad Pande Vs. Maharashtra Council of Acupuncture, thr. its President & Ors.)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders
