Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 21 (0.88 seconds)

D Narasimha vs South Central Railway on 15 October, 2025

Railways is deemed to be prior to 22.12.2003 against the backlog vacancy of ST and accordingly extend the benefit of coverage under Railway Services (Pension ... 2025 issued to fill up the backlog vacancies pertaining to the period prior to 11.12.2004. The said backlog vacancies pertain to the unfilled vacancies
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

B Balaji vs M/O Defence on 8 April, 2021

pending adjudication. However, respondents based on the impugned notification, which includes backlog vacancies of LDCE of 2011, conducted the exam in September 2013, in which ... error and hence, these vacancies were shown as backlog vacancies. When the HQ was approached to fill up these vacancies from Page
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Chandan Singh vs Dept Of Atomic Energy on 2 February, 2021

this stage that this was a special recruitment drive for unfilled backlog vacancies reserved to be filled up by disabled persons and all the candidates ... that the recruitment was a special drive to fill up the backlog vacancies of the physically challenged. Hence any interference at this stage would
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

M Jeethender Reddy vs M/O Defence on 5 July, 2021

candidate, who qualified on merit were shown against reserved vacancies instead of UR vacancies. A similar mistake was repeated in 2008 notification when ... appointments i.r.o. 2011 notifications were finalized. However, the backlog vacancies of 3 SC and 1 ST were carried forward to 2013 notification
Central Administrative Tribunal - Hyderabad Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next