Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 86 (2.24 seconds)

Bindu Sehgal vs Uoi And Ors. on 19 November, 2015

with appropriate directions for cadre formations)- the recommendations were ignored by the BRO, which fell back to the ACP Scheme. The ACP scheme, envisions ... Department of Official Language (Ministry of Home Affairs). The BRO however granted the petitioner the pay scale of `8000- 13500, admissible to those working
Delhi High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - S R Bhat - Full Document

Mrs. S. Bolar vs Bro. Thomas Thanickal on 5 December, 2015

Bolar vs Bro. Thomas Thanickal on 5 December, 2015 IN THE COURT OF THE VIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-15) AT BENGALURU ... Phase, Bengaluru - 560 078. (By Smt. Rosa Paramel, Advocate) -VERSUS- DEFENDANT : Bro. Thomas Thanickal, S/o. Joseph, Aged about 57 years, Principal, Cambridge School, Cantonment
Bangalore District Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajeev Khatri vs Fans Bro Erectors on 25 March, 2015

Rajeev Khatri vs Fans Bro Erectors on 25 March, 2015 CHHATTISGARH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANDRI, RAIPUR (C.G) Appeal ... Instituted on : 27.08.2014 Fans Bro Erectors, 410, Plot No.74, Shubh Ashirwad, C.H.S., Jay Prakash Nagar, Mumbai - 400063 ... Appellant Vs. Rajiv Khatri, Prop
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Fans Bro Erectors vs Rajeev Khatri on 25 March, 2015

Fans Bro Erectors vs Rajeev Khatri on 25 March, 2015 CHHATTISGARH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANDRI, RAIPUR (C.G) Appeal ... Instituted on : 27.08.2014 Fans Bro Erectors, 410, Plot No.74, Shubh Ashirwad, C.H.S., Jay Prakash Nagar, Mumbai - 400063 ... Appellant Vs. Rajiv Khatri, Prop
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next