Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 24 (1.45 seconds)
Documents citing Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance ... vs Smt. Mulakathalla Chennamma 5 Others on 26 September, 2023

Laxmi Narian Etc vs Bhagu Ram Etc on 15 October, 2025

7. Evidently, from the record Darshna died after she was run over by the trolley. At the time of accident, the same was being pulled by the Tractor. The issue regarding accident having been caused by trolley and the consequential liability to be borne by the insurer of the Tractor, has been dealt by Supreme Court in the case of 'The Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Limited vs. Smt. Honnamma and others' Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.2135 of 2023, decided on 05.05.2025 as under:
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - P Jain - Full Document

Paramjit Kaur And Anr vs Partap Singh And Ors on 28 January, 2026

25. Hon'ble the Supreme Court has recently authoritatively settled the issue in Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Ltd. v. Smt. Hannamma, 2025 INSC 625, wherein it has been categorically held that an insurance company cannot evade its liability to pay compensation merely on the ground that the trolley attached to the tractor was not separately insured, when the tractor itself was duly insured. The relevant extract of the same is reproduce as thus:
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - S P Sharma - Full Document

Jaideep @ Jagdeep vs Indrawati And Ors on 13 February, 2026

18. Insofar as the first ground is concerned, the Ld. Tribunal has held that since no separate premium was paid for the attached trolley, the Insurance Company stood absolved of its liability. However, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Limited v. Smt. Honnamma, (2025) ACJ 1002 (SC), has categorically held that the insurer cannot avoid its liability merely on the ground that the trailer attached to the tractor was not separately insured. The Apex Court has clarified that when a tractor is duly insured and the trailer is attached for the purpose for which such vehicle is ordinarily used, the insurer cannot escape liability towards third-party claimants on hyper-technical grounds relating to separate insurance of the trailer.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - S P Sharma - Full Document

Kuldeep & Anr vs Poonam & Ors on 5 March, 2026

11.5 In view of the above discussion and the ratio of the decision in The Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Limited's case (supra), it is held that where a tractor attached with trolley going on a road causes an accident which took place with the involvement of the tractor, the Insurance Company cannot be exonerated on account of the reason that the trolley-trailer 9 of 11 ::: Downloaded on - 09-03-2026 21:53:39 ::: -10- FAO-
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pooja vs Bablu on 24 March, 2026

MACT No. 321/2018 Pooja vs. Bablu & Ors. Page No. 17 of 26 40.1 In view of the law laid down in Smt. Honnamma (supra), where the tractor is the root cause of the accident, the liability of the insurer of the tractor extends to the consequences arising through the attached trailer or water tanker. The facts of the present case are squarely covered by the said judgment and the contention of respondent no. 3 is, therefore, liable to be rejected.
Delhi District Court Cites 23 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd vs Rameshbhai Manharbhai Vasava on 4 May, 2026

12. Notably, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Honnamma (supra), agreed with the view expressed by the Page 21 of 27 Uploaded by AMAR RATHOD(HC01074) on Thu May 14 2026 Downloaded on : Fri May 15 23:02:06 IST 2026 NEUTRAL CITATION C/FA/2195/2016 JUDGMENT DATED: 04/05/2026 undefined Hon'ble Division Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Kadapa District Vs. Koduru Bhagyamma, 2007 SCC OnLine AP 830, which opined :
Gujarat High Court Cites 19 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next