Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.40 seconds)

Sabera Khatoon vs Union Of India on 21 August, 2023

As noted above, the petitioner does not seek to get the present petition tagged with Mohammad Salimullah (supra) since, according to counsel for the petitioner, the issues which have been raised are different. 8 In that view of the matter, it is only appropriate and proper that the petition before the High Court of Delhi is permitted to be revived as the issues raised in the present petition can be addressed before the High Court. We keep open all the rights and contentions of the petitioner in that regard. The petitioner would be at liberty to seek interim directions before the High Court of Delhi. 9 Writ Petition (Criminal) No 1311 of 2023 is accordingly revived by setting aside the order of the High Court of Delhi dated 4 July 2023 for reasons indicated above.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 4 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Page No.# 1/4 vs The Union Of India And 3 Ors on 15 September, 2021

The learned CGC has produced a copy of order dated 08.04.2021 passed by the Supreme Court of India passed in connection with IA No.38048/2021 in WP(C) 793/2017 of Mohammad Salimullah and another Vs. Union of India and ors. From the contents of the order, it is seen that the petitioners before the Supreme Court of India are members of Rohingya community who had taken refuge in India and the said Interlocutory application was filed seeking: (1) the release of the detained Rohingya refugees; and (2) a direction to the Union of India not to deport the Rohingya refugees who had been detained in the Sub-Jail in Jammu. However, by the said order, the interim prayer was rejected, making it clear that the Rohingyas in Jammu, on whose behalf the said application was filed, shall not be deported unless the procedure prescribed for such deportation is followed.
Gauhati High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - K R Surana - Full Document

Rashida Begum vs The Union Of India And 5 Ors on 29 July, 2024

In respect of the second prayer made in this writ petition for a direction upon the respondent authorities for marking arrangement for the petitioner to make request before the UNCHR at New Delhi to grant her refugee status, Mr. A. Kalita, the learned Amicus Curiae has submitted that India is not a signatory to the United Nations convention on the status of Refugees, 1951 and in this regard he places reliance on the decision of the Supreme Court of India in the Page No.# 3/3 case of Mohd. Salimullah and Anr. Vs Union of India and Ors. reported in (2021) 19 SCC 191 for the purposes of bringing to the notice of the Court that in so far as the prayer for the release of the detained Rohingya refugees and for a direction on the Union of India not to deport the Rohingya refugees, the Supreme Court of India had already dismissed interlocutory applications for similar relief.
Gauhati High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1