citedby: 113378974

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Apeejay Pvt. Ltd on 5 February, 2024

Learned Senior Advocate for the respondent/assessee submitted that the issue involved in the present appeal is squarely covered in favour of the assessee in the light of the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Madhur Housing & Development Co., 401 ITR 152 (SC); Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. Ankitech P. Ltd., (2012) 340 ITR 14 (Delhi); Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai vs. Checkpoint Apparel Labelling 2 Solutions (India) Ltd., (2020) 120 taxmann.com 125 (Madras) and Mahimananda Mishra vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax, (2023) 455 ITR 449 (Orissa). Copies of the said decisions have been handed over to the learned Advocate for the appellant department. He seeks time to go through the same.

Calcutta High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - S Bhattacharya - Full Document

The Principal Commissioner Of Income ... vs Apeejay Pvt. Ltd on 5 February, 2024

Learned Senior Advocate for the respondent/assessee submitted that the issue involved in the present appeal is squarely covered in favour of the assessee in the light of the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Madhur Housing & Development Co., 401 ITR 152 (SC); Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. Ankitech P. Ltd., (2012) 340 ITR 14 (Delhi); Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai vs. Checkpoint Apparel Labelling 2 Solutions (India) Ltd., (2020) 120 taxmann.com 125 (Madras) and Mahimananda Mishra vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax, (2023) 455 ITR 449 (Orissa). Copies of the said decisions have been handed over to the learned Advocate for the appellant department. He seeks time to go through the same.

Calcutta High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - S Bhattacharya - Full Document

The Principal Commissioner Of Income ... vs Apeejay Pvt. Ltd on 5 February, 2024

Learned Senior Advocate for the respondent/assessee submitted that the issue involved in the present appeal is squarely covered in favour of the assessee in the light of the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Madhur Housing & Development Co., 401 ITR 152 (SC); Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. Ankitech P. Ltd., (2012) 340 ITR 14 (Delhi); Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai vs. Checkpoint Apparel Labelling 2 Solutions (India) Ltd., (2020) 120 taxmann.com 125 (Madras) and Mahimananda Mishra vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax, (2023) 455 ITR 449 (Orissa). Copies of the said decisions have been handed over to the learned Advocate for the appellant department. He seeks time to go through the same.

Calcutta High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - S Bhattacharya - Full Document

The Principal Commissioner Of Income ... vs Apeejay Pvt. Ltd on 1 May, 2024

We have heard learned Counsel appearing for the parties. Learned Counsel for the respondent/assessee had submitted that the question of law raised in this appeal is squarely covered in favour of the assessee in the light of the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Madhur Housing & Development Co., (2018) 93 taxmann.com 502(SC) as well as the decisions in (2012) 340 ITR 14 (Delhi) and (2020) 120 taxmann.com 125 (Madras). Copies of the decisions were handed over to the appellant on the last hearing day. There is nothing brought on record by the revenue to point out any distinguishing feature for us not to follow the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the decisions referred above.

Calcutta High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - T S Sivagnanam - Full Document

The Principal Commissioner Of Income ... vs Apeejay Pvt. Ltd on 1 May, 2024

We have heard learned Counsel appearing for the parties. Learned Counsel for the respondent/assessee had submitted that the question of law raised in this appeal is squarely covered in favour of the assessee in the light of the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Madhur Housing & Development Co., (2018) 93 taxmann.com 502(SC) as well as the decisions in (2012) 340 ITR 14 (Delhi) and (2020) 120 taxmann.com 125 (Madras). Copies of the decisions were handed over to the appellant on the last hearing day. There is nothing brought on record by the revenue to point out any distinguishing feature for us not to follow the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the decisions referred above.

Calcutta High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - T S Sivagnanam - Full Document

The Principal Commissioner Of Income ... vs Apeejay Pvt. Ltd on 1 May, 2024

We have heard learned Counsel appearing for the parties. Learned Counsel for the respondent/assessee had submitted that the question of law raised in this appeal is squarely covered in favour of the assessee in the light of the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Madhur Housing & Development Co., (2018) 93 taxmann.com 502(SC) as well as the decisions in (2012) 340 ITR 14 (Delhi) and (2020) 120 taxmann.com 125 (Madras). Copies of the decisions were handed over to the appellant on the last hearing day. There is nothing brought on record by the revenue to point out any distinguishing feature for us not to follow the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the decisions referred above.

Calcutta High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - T S Sivagnanam - Full Document

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 1 ... vs Apeejay Surendra Amanagement Services ... on 21 April, 2026

We have heard learned Counsel appearing for the parties. Learned Counsel for the respondent/assessee had submitted that the question of law raised in this appeal is squarely covered in favour of the assessee in the light of the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Madhur Housing & Development Co., (2018) 93 taxmann.com 502(SC) as well as the decisions in (2012) 340 ITR 14 (Delhi) and (2020) 120 taxmann.com 125 (Madras). There is nothing brought on record by the revenue to point out any distinguishing feature for us not to follow the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the decisions referred above.

Calcutta High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - R Bharadwaj - Full Document

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 1 ... vs Apeejay Surendra Amanagement Services ... on 21 April, 2026

We have heard learned Counsel appearing for the parties. Learned Counsel for the respondent/assessee had submitted that the question of law raised in this appeal is squarely covered in favour of the assessee in the light of the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Madhur Housing & Development Co., (2018) 93 taxmann.com 502(SC) as well as the decisions in (2012) 340 ITR 14 (Delhi) and (2020) 120 taxmann.com 125 (Madras). There is nothing brought on record by the revenue to point out any distinguishing feature for us not to follow the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the decisions referred above.

Calcutta High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - R Bharadwaj - Full Document

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 1 ... vs Apeejay Surendra Amanagement Services ... on 21 April, 2026

We have heard learned Counsel appearing for the parties. Learned Counsel for the respondent/assessee had submitted that the question of law raised in this appeal is squarely covered in favour of the assessee in the light of the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Madhur Housing & Development Co., (2018) 93 taxmann.com 502(SC) as well as the decisions in (2012) 340 ITR 14 (Delhi) and (2020) 120 taxmann.com 125 (Madras). There is nothing brought on record by the revenue to point out any distinguishing feature for us not to follow the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the decisions referred above.

Calcutta High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - R Bharadwaj - Full Document

Search Results Page

Refine Search

Search Results