Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.55 seconds)

Naagraj Ganeshmal Jain vs P. Sri Sai Ram on 17 August, 2001

In this context the observation made by Supreme Court in Keshoram & Co. v. Union of India [1989] 3 SCC 151 is to be noted. In the said case the Apex Court while considering the validity of section 3 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 and the notification dated 24-9-1974, granting examination from section 13 of the Act to buildings constructed in the urban area, observed as follows :
Securities Appellate Tribunal Cites 21 - Cited by 2 - Full Document

Shafiqul Haque Mazumder vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 3 November, 2006

The learned Counsel also placed reliance on the judgments of this Court as well as the Apex Court in the case of Chhotelal v. Union of India and Ors. reported in (1989) 1 GLR 307, State of Maharasthra v. Chandravan , Sri Bimalendur Bhagavati v. AGCC and Ors. reported in 1995 (11) GLT 378, Fakirbhai Fuibhai Solanki v. Presiding Officer and Ors. , Depot Manager, A.P., State Road Transport Corporation v. Md. Yusuf Mia , Ghanshyam Das Shrivastava v. State of Madhya Pradesh .
Gauhati High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 1 - U B Saha - Full Document
1