Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.57 seconds)

Union Of India Through Department Of ... vs Narayan Chouhan on 2 December, 2019

In Upendra Narayan & Ors (supra) and Renu and Others (supra), relied upon by learned counsel for the respondents, the issue before the Hon'ble Apex Court was regarding regularisation of the services of the Casual Labourers/Daily Wagers/ad-hoc employees, who were not appointed as per the Recruitment Rules, whereas in the instant case, the applicant was appointed as Postal Assistant on regular basis and is being terminated after conducting a regular departmental enquiry. Moreover, the charge of his appointment being not as per rules, could not be established during the departmental enquiry. Therefore, it cannot be said that appointment of the applicant was contrary to the departmental rules.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - S C Sharma - Full Document

Union Of India Through Ministry Of ... vs Vishwas Nimgaonkar on 21 January, 2020

In Upendra Narayan & Ors (supra) and Renu and Others (supra), relied upon by learned counsel for the respondents, the issue before the Hon'ble Apex Court was regarding regularisation of the services of the Casual Labourers/Daily Wagers/ad-hoc employees, who were not appointed as per the Recruitment Rules, whereas in the instant case, the applicant was appointed as Postal Assistant on regular basis and is being terminated after conducting a regular departmental enquiry. Moreover, the charge of his appointment being not as per rules, could not be established during the departmental enquiry. Therefore, it cannot be said that appointment of the applicant was contrary to the departmental rules.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - S C Sharma - Full Document
1