State vs Shyam Babu Chaudhary on 29 November, 2014
4.15 PW-15 Sh. Rajender Singh is the Metropolitan
Magistrate, who had recorded the statement of master Bhole under
Section 164 Cr.P.C. He proved recording the said statement on
15.09.2011 as Ex. PW5/A. He proved his proceedings as Ex.
PW15/A, his Certificate as Ex. PW15/B, his order for sealing the
statement in an envelope as Ex. PW15/C and allowing the copy of
the statement to be given to the IO as Ex. PW15/D.
4.16 PW-16 Dr. Sudipta Ranjan Singh conducted autopsy
on the body of Abhishekh Choudhary on 05.07.2011 at about 2:00
p.m. She stated that there was a skeletonisation and there were
animal gnawing marks on the bones. Time since death could not
be determined with certainty. There was no soft tissue and no
injury was appreciable on the skeleton remains. She proved her
report as Ex. PW16/A. She stated that even no definite opinion
regarding sex could be given with absolute certainty.
SC No. 10/13 : FIR No. 229/11 : 'State v. Shyam Babu Chaudhary' 17 /48
Anatomically, the bones seemed to be of human origin and they
could be of a child as the bones were smaller and lighter. The skull
was also smaller and lighter and only the upper jaw was present
and mandible was missing. The upper jaw had total 12 teeth, out of
which 2 showed only crowning. The age of the deceased could be
more than 4 years but less than 7 years. Later on, on 07.07.2011,
IO requested for collection of the blood samples of the parents of
the deceased. She examined Rekha - mother of the deceased vide
Ex. PW16/B and Suresh - father of the deceased vide Ex. PW16/C.
Blood sample of both these persons were taken and were preserved
with the seal of the hospital and given to the IO. She proved the
request of the IO as Ex. PW16/D. In the cross-examination, she
stated that there could be an error in age approximation towards
higher side to nine year. She stated that she did not check
documentary proof regarding identity of Rekha and Suresh
Chaudhary.